不明轨迹与不确定获益:通过德尔菲共识法为重症或晚期疾病患者的临床不确定性创建术语表

Unclear Trajectory and Uncertain Benefit: Creating a Lexicon for Clinical Uncertainty in Patients with Critical or Advanced Illness Using a Delphi Consensus Process.

作者信息

McGowan Samuel K, Corrales-Martinez Maria-Jose, Brender Teva, Smith Alexander K, Kim Shannen, Harrison Krista L, Mills Hunter, Lee Albert, Bamman David, Cobert Julien

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2025 Jan;45(1):34-44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241293446. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical uncertainty is associated with increased resource utilization, worsened health-related quality of life for patients, and provider burnout, particularly during critical illness. Existing data are limited, because determining uncertainty from notes typically requires manual, qualitative review. We sought to develop a consensus list of descriptors of clinical uncertainty and then, using a thematic analysis approach, describe how respondents consider their use in intensive care unit (ICU) notes, such that future work can extract uncertainty data at scale.

DESIGN

We conducted a Delphi consensus study with physicians across multiple institutions nationally who care for critically ill patients or patients with advanced illnesses. Participants were given a definition for clinical uncertainty and collaborated through multiple rounds to determine which words represent uncertainty in clinician notes. We also administered surveys that included open-ended questions to participants about clinical uncertainty. Following derivation of a consensus list, we analyzed participant responses using thematic analysis to understand the role of uncertainty in clinical documentation.

RESULTS

Nineteen physicians participated in at least 2 of the Delphi rounds. Consensus was achieved for 44 words or phrases over 5 rounds of the Delphi process. Clinicians described comfort with using uncertainty terms and used them in a variety of ways: documenting and processing the diagnostic thinking process, enlisting help, identifying incomplete information, and practicing transparency to reflect uncertainty that was present.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a consensus process, we created an uncertainty lexicon that can be used for uncertainty data extraction from the medical record. We demonstrate that physicians, particularly in the ICU, are comfortable with uncertainty and document uncertainty terms frequently to convey the complexity and ambiguity that is pervasive in critical illness.

HIGHLIGHTS

Question: What words do physicians caring for critically ill patients use to document clinical uncertainty, and why?Findings: A consensus list of 44 words or phrases was identified by a group of experts. Physicians expressed comfort with using these words in the electronic health record.Meaning: Physicians are comfortable with uncertainty words and document them frequently to convey the complexity and ambiguity that is pervasive in critical illness.

摘要

背景

临床不确定性与资源利用增加、患者健康相关生活质量恶化以及医护人员职业倦怠有关,在危重病期间尤其如此。现有数据有限,因为从病历记录中确定不确定性通常需要人工定性审查。我们试图制定一份临床不确定性描述词的共识清单,然后采用主题分析方法,描述受访者如何看待这些描述词在重症监护病房(ICU)病历记录中的使用情况,以便未来的工作能够大规模提取不确定性数据。

设计

我们对全国多个机构中照顾危重病患者或晚期疾病患者的医生进行了一项德尔菲共识研究。向参与者给出了临床不确定性的定义,并通过多轮协作来确定哪些词汇代表临床医生病历记录中的不确定性。我们还对参与者进行了包含关于临床不确定性的开放式问题的调查。在得出共识清单后,我们使用主题分析来分析参与者的回答,以了解不确定性在临床记录中的作用。

结果

19名医生至少参与了2轮德尔菲过程。在德尔菲过程的5轮中,就44个单词或短语达成了共识。临床医生表示对使用不确定性术语感到安心,并以多种方式使用它们:记录和梳理诊断思维过程、寻求帮助、识别不完整信息以及通过体现存在的不确定性来保持透明度。

结论

通过共识过程,我们创建了一个不确定性词汇表,可用于从医疗记录中提取不确定性数据。我们证明,医生,尤其是ICU中的医生,对不确定性感到安心,并经常记录不确定性术语以传达危重病中普遍存在的复杂性和模糊性。

要点

问题:照顾危重病患者的医生使用哪些词汇来记录临床不确定性,以及原因是什么?

发现

一组专家确定了一份包含44个单词或短语的共识清单。医生表示对在电子健康记录中使用这些词汇感到安心。

意义

医生对不确定性词汇感到安心,并经常记录它们以传达危重病中普遍存在的复杂性和模糊性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索