Schoser Benedikt, Attarian Shahram, Graham Ryan, Holdbrook Fred, Goldman Mitchell, Díaz-Manera Jordi
Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Department of Neurology, LMU University Clinic, Munich, Germany.
Reference Center for Neuromuscular Diseases and ALS, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
J Neurol. 2025 Jan 7;272(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12843-x.
PROPEL (ATB200-03; NCT03729362) compared the efficacy and safety of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat (cipa + mig), a two-component therapy for late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD), versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo (alg + pbo). The primary endpoint was change in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 52. During PROPEL, COVID-19 interrupted some planned study visits and assessment windows, leading to delayed visits, make-up assessments for patients who missed ≥ 3 successive infusions before planned assessments at weeks 38 and 52, and some advanced visits (end-of-study/early-termination visits). These were remapped to the respective planned visits. To evaluate if remapping may have overestimated treatment effects, we conducted post hoc analyses using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures based on actual time points of assessments. In this post hoc analysis, estimated mean treatment difference between cipa + mig and alg + pbo for change from baseline to week 52 in 6MWD was 11.7 m (95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.0 to 24.4; p = 0.072). In the original published analyses, between-group difference using last observation carried forward was 13.6 m (95% CI - 2.8 to 29.9; p = 0.071 [p value from separate non-parametric analysis of covariance]). Both statistical analysis approaches led to similar results and consistent conclusions, confirming the efficacy of cipa + mig for adults with LOPD. NCT03729362; trial start date: December 4, 2018.Trial registration number.
PROPEL(ATB200 - 03;NCT03729362)比较了用于晚发型庞贝病(LOPD)的双组分疗法西帕葡萄糖苷酶α加米格鲁司他(cipa + mig)与阿糖苷酶α加安慰剂(alg + pbo)的疗效和安全性。主要终点是从基线到第52周6分钟步行距离(6MWD)的变化。在PROPEL研究期间,新冠疫情中断了一些计划中的研究访视和评估窗口,导致访视延迟,对在第38周和第52周计划评估前连续错过≥3次输注的患者进行补充评估,以及一些提前访视(研究结束/提前终止访视)。这些访视被重新安排到各自计划的访视时间。为评估重新安排访视时间是否可能高估了治疗效果,我们基于实际评估时间点,使用重复测量的混合效应模型进行了事后分析。在此事后分析中,cipa + mig与alg + pbo相比,从基线到第52周6MWD变化的估计平均治疗差异为11.7米(95%置信区间[CI] - 1.0至24.4;p = 0.072)。在最初发表的分析中,采用末次观察结转法的组间差异为13.6米(95% CI - 2.8至29.9;p = 0.071[来自单独非参数协方差分析的p值])。两种统计分析方法得出了相似的结果和一致的结论,证实了cipa + mig对成年LOPD患者的疗效。NCT03729362;试验开始日期:2018年12月4日。试验注册号。