• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻成人半月板桶柄状撕裂与恢复运动:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Meniscal Bucket-Handle Tears and Return to Sports in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Tsakiri Vasiliki, Kyriakidis Theofylaktos, Papadopoulos Polychronis, Davitis Vasileios, Chalidis Byron, Papadopoulos Periklis, Gigis Ioannis

机构信息

2nd Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital "G. Gennimatas" Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.

School of Medicine, 1st Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81329. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81329. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.81329
PMID:40291293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12034012/
Abstract

Bucket-handle tears represent a subtype of meniscal injuries that involve a full-thickness longitudinal tear. These tears are challenging and demanding. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate return-to-sport outcomes in young adults with isolated bucket-handle meniscal tears treated surgically through meniscal repair. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with two independent reviewers selecting studies from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they involved patients over 16 years old, with isolated bucket-handle tears, a minimum of one-year follow-up, and reported postoperative Tegner scores. Five studies comprising 168 individual knees met these criteria and were analyzed. Quality assessment employed the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data analysis was conducted in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) for pooled outcome calculations. The primary outcome was the postoperative Tegner score, representing a return to sports; secondary outcomes included changes in Tegner and Lysholm scores and failure rates. Two cohort studies and three case series were included, with quality ratings ranging from fair to poor. The mean patient age was 27.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 82.4 months. The pooled postoperative Tegner score was 5.94 (95% CI: 5.41-6.46), indicating a high return to recreational sports. The mean change in Tegner score was 2.48 (p = 0.0604), which was not statistically significant, while Lysholm score improvement was significant at 31.16 points (p = 0.0093). The pooled failure rate across studies was 14% (95% CI: 0-42%). Patients with isolated bucket-handle meniscal tears undergoing surgical repair demonstrate a high rate of return to recreational sports, with significant improvements in Lysholm scores. However, failure rates and study quality variability suggest further high-quality research to make safer conclusions.

摘要

桶柄状撕裂是半月板损伤的一种亚型,涉及全层纵向撕裂。这些撕裂具有挑战性且要求较高。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估通过半月板修复手术治疗的孤立性桶柄状半月板撕裂的年轻成年人的运动恢复结果。本评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,由两名独立评审员从PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库中筛选研究。纳入的研究需涉及16岁以上的患者、孤立性桶柄状撕裂、至少一年的随访,并报告术后Tegner评分。五项研究共168个膝关节符合这些标准并进行了分析。质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表。在R(奥地利维也纳的R统计计算基金会)中进行数据分析以计算合并结果。主要结果是术后Tegner评分,代表恢复运动;次要结果包括Tegner和Lysholm评分的变化以及失败率。纳入了两项队列研究和三项病例系列研究,质量评级从中等到差。患者平均年龄为27.8岁,平均随访时间为82.4个月。术后Tegner评分合并值为5.94(95%CI:5.41 - 6.46),表明恢复娱乐性运动的比例较高。Tegner评分的平均变化为2.48(p = 0.0604),无统计学意义,而Lysholm评分改善显著,为31.16分(p = 0.0093)。各研究的合并失败率为14%(95%CI:0 - 42%)。接受手术修复的孤立性桶柄状半月板撕裂患者恢复娱乐性运动的比例较高,Lysholm评分有显著改善。然而,失败率和研究质量的变异性表明需要进一步开展高质量研究以得出更可靠的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/0ec655eb2f0a/cureus-0017-00000081329-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/03e3f8ec1873/cureus-0017-00000081329-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/5a6503ace130/cureus-0017-00000081329-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/2fce511682ca/cureus-0017-00000081329-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/49a460fd69de/cureus-0017-00000081329-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/0ec655eb2f0a/cureus-0017-00000081329-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/03e3f8ec1873/cureus-0017-00000081329-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/5a6503ace130/cureus-0017-00000081329-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/2fce511682ca/cureus-0017-00000081329-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/49a460fd69de/cureus-0017-00000081329-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/121d/12034012/0ec655eb2f0a/cureus-0017-00000081329-i05.jpg

相似文献

1
Meniscal Bucket-Handle Tears and Return to Sports in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.年轻成人半月板桶柄状撕裂与恢复运动:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81329. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81329. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Comparable Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repair and Vertical Meniscal Repair Can Be Achieved at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up.在至少2年的随访中,桶柄状半月板修复和垂直半月板修复可获得相似的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3104-3110. doi: 10.1177/0363546517719244. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.径向与桶柄状半月板撕裂修复的对比结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2653-2660. doi: 10.1177/0363546518786035. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
4
Evaluation of Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Arthroscopically Repaired Vertical Longitudinal and Bucket-Handle Lateral Meniscal Tears.关节镜修复垂直纵向和桶柄状外侧半月板撕裂的中期临床和影像学结果评估
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 May 10;7(5):2325967119843203. doi: 10.1177/2325967119843203. eCollection 2019 May.
5
Clinical outcomes following surgically repaired bucket-handle meniscus tears.手术修复半月板桶柄状撕裂后的临床结果
Phys Sportsmed. 2017 Sep;45(3):329-336. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2017.1331688. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
Long-term follow-up of bucket-handle meniscal repairs: chondroprotective effect outweighs high failure risk.桶柄状半月板修复的长期随访:软骨保护作用大于高失败风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2209-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06787-2. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
7
What Is the Failure Rate After Arthroscopic Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.桶柄状半月板撕裂关节镜修复术后的失败率是多少?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6):1742-1752. doi: 10.1177/03635465211015425. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
8
Clinical outcome and failure analysis of medial meniscus bucket-handle tear repair: a series of 96 patients with a minimum 2 year follow-up.内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复的临床结果和失败分析:一组 96 例患者的至少 2 年随访。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1649-1654. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03346-1. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
Surgical Repair of Neglected Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears Displaced into the Intercondylar Notch: Clinical and Radiological Results.手术修复移位至髁间切迹的陈旧性半月板桶柄状撕裂:临床及影像学结果
J Knee Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):514-519. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604146. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
The relationship between ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair: quality of life, sports return, and meniscal failure rate-2- to 12-year follow-up.前交叉韧带重建与半月板修复的关系:生活质量、运动恢复和半月板失败率-2-12 年随访。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 27;15(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01878-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Repair of bucket handle meniscus tears improves patient outcomes versus partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction.在进行前交叉韧带重建时,与部分半月板切除术相比,桶柄状半月板撕裂修复术能改善患者预后。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Aug 28;11(3):e70004. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70004. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Meniscus treatment: biological augmentation strategies: a narrative review.半月板治疗:生物增强策略:一项叙述性综述
Ann Jt. 2022 Jul 15;7:25. doi: 10.21037/aoj-21-14. eCollection 2022.
3
All-Inside and Inside-Out Repair Techniques for Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears Both Result in Improved Patient Outcomes and a Broad Range of Failure Rates: A Systematic Review.
全内和内外侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复技术均能改善患者预后,且失败率差异较大:一项系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Sep;40(9):2477-2490.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.021. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
4
Medial meniscal repair in stable knees: Survival rate and risk factors for failure at a minimum of 5 years.稳定膝关节内侧半月板修复:至少 5 年的生存率和失败的风险因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Dec;109(8S):103681. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103681. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
5
Meniscus tears treatment: The good, the bad and the ugly-patterns classification and practical guide.半月板撕裂的治疗:优劣与丑态——分型分类及实用指南
World J Orthop. 2023 Apr 18;14(4):171-185. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i4.171.
6
Failure Rates of Repaired Bucket-Handle Tears of the Medial Meniscus Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 253 Patients From the SANTI Study Group With a Mean Follow-up of 94 Months.内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复术与前交叉韧带重建术同时进行的失败率:来自SANTI研究组的253例患者队列研究,平均随访94个月。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(3):585-595. doi: 10.1177/03635465221148497. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
7
Clinical outcome and healing rate after meniscal bucket handle tear repair.半月板桶柄状撕裂修复后的临床结果和愈合率。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06037-7.
8
Review of Meniscus Anatomy and Biomechanics.半月板解剖学与生物力学综述
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022 Oct;15(5):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s12178-022-09768-1. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
9
Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study.一期修复合并前交叉韧带重建的移位型瓣状半月板撕裂可获得良好的半月板存活率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jun;104-B(6):680-686. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B6.BJJ-2021-1340.R2.
10
Nineteen percent of meniscus repairs are being revised and failures frequently occur after the second postoperative year: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.19%的半月板修复术需要翻修,且术后第二年常出现失败:一项至少随访 5 年的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2267-2276. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06770-x. Epub 2021 Oct 20.