Schmidt D, Ullrich D, Rossner R
Abteilung für Neuro-Ophthalmologie and Schielbehandlung, Universitäts-Augenklinik Freiburg, Germany.
Ger J Ophthalmol. 1993 Aug;2(4-5):251-5.
Electronystagmographic (ENG) recordings of eye movements were made during the horizontal and vertical reading of a standardized text. The text was rotated to one side through an angle of 90 degrees for vertical reading. A total of 35 normal subjects was investigated under identical conditions. The following differences were found: A "staircase" pattern of successive, remarkably regular eye jerks was observed during horizontal reading. The reading speed was significantly higher in the horizontal direction. Vertical eye movements during vertical reading were less regular and showed a greater number of small jerks of varying size. No significant difference in reading speed between the two vertical directions was found. The search coil method (Robinson), which was employed in one subject, yielded much more accurate recordings than did the ENG. As a control experiment for vertical reading, the letters were rotated through 90 degrees. Reading this transposed text took twice as long as reading a 90 degrees-rotated text.
在对一篇标准化文本进行水平和垂直阅读时,记录了眼震电图(ENG)的眼动情况。文本在垂直阅读时向一侧旋转了90度。在相同条件下,共对35名正常受试者进行了研究。发现了以下差异:在水平阅读过程中观察到连续、非常规则的眼跳呈“阶梯”模式。水平方向的阅读速度明显更高。垂直阅读时的垂直眼动不太规则,且出现了更多大小不一的小跳动。两个垂直方向之间的阅读速度没有显著差异。在一名受试者中使用的搜索线圈法(罗宾逊法)比眼震电图记录更准确。作为垂直阅读的对照实验,字母旋转了90度。阅读这种颠倒的文本所花费的时间是阅读旋转90度文本的两倍。