Rosaeg O P, Yarnell R W, Lindsay M P
Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa Civic Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario.
Can J Anaesth. 1993 Apr;40(4):346-56. doi: 10.1007/BF03009634.
We reviewed the out-patient consultation notes of 136 pregnant women seen at the Ottawa Civic Hospital from 1985 to 1991 to evaluate the efficacy of an Obstetric Anaesthesia Assessment Clinic (OAC). In addition, their anaesthetic records from labour and delivery were reviewed. For each patient the reason for referral was recorded according to the involved organ system. The anaesthetic management at delivery was compared with the proposed anaesthetic plan by the OAC consultant (obstetric anaesthetist). The majority of women 84 (62%) had complaints related to the musculo-skeletal system. In addition, 18 patients were referred because of previous anaesthetic problems, ten with a history of cardiac disease, and eight with neurological disease. Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) was a safe and effective choice for parturients with low back pain, history of lumbar fractures or single level discectomies without lumbar fusion. Parturients with posterior instrumentation experienced an increased incidence of inadequate pain relief from LEA. Individualized anaesthetic management plans were executed for parturients with spina bifida occulta, neurological, cardiac, and haematological disease as well as for women, with a history of adverse drug reactions and previous problems with regional or general anaesthesia. It is concluded that the OAC has provided a valuable service to obstetricians and anaesthetists for the anaesthetic management of pregnant women with co-existing disease. The OAC gave an opportunity for patient education regarding anaesthetic options for labour and delivery. The attending anaesthetist was provided with a risk assessment and anaesthetic management plan which was adhered to with only two exceptions. Finally, the obstetrician was given consistent advice regarding anaesthesia management that may affect obstetrical decisions.
我们回顾了1985年至1991年期间在渥太华市民医院就诊的136名孕妇的门诊咨询记录,以评估产科麻醉评估诊所(OAC)的疗效。此外,还查阅了她们分娩时的麻醉记录。对于每位患者,根据所涉及的器官系统记录转诊原因。将分娩时的麻醉管理与OAC顾问(产科麻醉医生)提出的麻醉计划进行比较。大多数女性(84名,占62%)有与肌肉骨骼系统相关的主诉。此外,18名患者因既往麻醉问题转诊,10名有心脏病史,8名有神经疾病史。对于有腰痛、腰椎骨折史或未行腰椎融合的单节段椎间盘切除术史的产妇,腰段硬膜外镇痛(LEA)是一种安全有效的选择。有后路内固定的产妇,LEA镇痛效果不佳的发生率增加。针对患有隐性脊柱裂、神经、心脏和血液系统疾病的产妇,以及有药物不良反应史和既往区域或全身麻醉问题的女性,实施了个体化的麻醉管理计划。结论是,OAC为产科医生和麻醉医生对合并疾病的孕妇进行麻醉管理提供了有价值的服务。OAC为患者提供了关于分娩麻醉选择的教育机会。为主治麻醉医生提供了风险评估和麻醉管理计划,仅有两例例外未遵循该计划。最后,就可能影响产科决策的麻醉管理向产科医生提供了一致的建议。