• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹股沟疝修补术后氯尼辛赖氨酸与对乙酰氨基酚/可待因的疗效及耐受性比较

Efficacy and tolerance of lysine clonixinate versus paracetamol/codeine following inguinal hernioplasty.

作者信息

de los Santos A R, Di Girolamo G, Martí M L

机构信息

School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Int J Tissue React. 1998;20(2):71-81.

PMID:9638504
Abstract

In this study lysine clonixinate, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent with selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 and 5-lipooxygenase in in vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic studies, was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical study versus paracetamol/codeine, in 151 patients with pain following inguinal hernioplasty. Patients were treated with one 125 mg tablet of lysine clonixinate or paracetamol/codeine (500 mg + 30 mg) administered at fixed doses every 4 h during 2 days. Controls were carried out 1, 2 and 4 h after the first intake of day 1 and day 2. Each control included assessment of pain at rest, when coughing, sitting and upon moderate pressure. Both treatment groups (lysine clonixinate, 77 patients and paracetamol/codeine, 74 patients) were comparable in terms of demographic and baseline pain intensities. Spontaneous pain was reduced significantly in both treatment groups from the 1st-h control. The following values were recorded in the lysine clonixinate group during day 1: baseline: 6.86 +/- 1.24; 1st h: 4.49 +/- 1.77; 2nd h: 2.96 +/- 1.74; 4th h: 2.23 +/- 1.51. The following values for the same group during day 2 were: predose: 1.70 +/- 1.64; 1st h: 1.16 +/- 1.17; 2nd h: 0.78 +/- 1.06; 4th h: 0.63 +/- 1.05. The paracetamol/codeine group revealed the following values: day 1: baseline: 6.72 +/- 1.22; 1st h: 4.57 +/- 1.72; 2nd h: 2.97 +/- 1.68; 4th h: 2.47 +/- 1.68 and day 2: predose: 2.02 +/- 1.57; 1st h: 1.32 +/- 1.23; 2nd h: 0.82 +/- 0.99; 4th h: 0.66 +/- 0.89. Reduction of pain induced by coughing, sitting and pressure showed similar behavior patterns. No significant differences between both treatment groups were encountered in terms of analgesic efficacy. Incidence of adverse effects was significantly higher in the paracetamol/codeine group (X2: p < 0.05): 11 out of 74 patients; three patients had to discontinue treatment. In the lysine clonixinate group four out of 77 patients showed side effects but these did not require treatment discontinuation.

摘要

在本研究中,赖氨酸氯尼辛酯是一种非甾体抗炎药,在体外和体内药效学研究中具有选择性抑制环氧化酶-2和5-脂氧合酶的作用。在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟临床研究中,将其与对乙酰氨基酚/可待因进行比较,研究对象为151例腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的患者。患者服用1片125mg的赖氨酸氯尼辛酯或对乙酰氨基酚/可待因(500mg + 30mg),每4小时固定剂量给药,持续2天。在第1天和第2天首次服药后1、2和4小时进行对照。每次对照包括评估静息时、咳嗽时、坐位时以及适度按压时的疼痛情况。两个治疗组(赖氨酸氯尼辛酯组77例患者,对乙酰氨基酚/可待因组74例患者)在人口统计学和基线疼痛强度方面具有可比性。从第1小时对照开始,两个治疗组的自发痛均显著减轻。赖氨酸氯尼辛酯组在第1天记录的以下数值:基线:6.86±1.24;第1小时:4.49±1.77;第2小时:2.96±1.74;第4小时:2.23±1.51。该组在第2天的以下数值为:给药前:1.70±1.64;第1小时:1.16±1.17;第2小时:0.78±1.06;第4小时:0.63±1.05。对乙酰氨基酚/可待因组的数值如下:第1天:基线:6.72±1.22;第1小时:4.57±1.72;第2小时:2.97±1.68;第4小时:2.47±1.68;第2天:给药前:2.02±1.57;第1小时:1.32±1.23;第2小时:0.82±0.99;第4小时:0.66±0.89。咳嗽、坐位和按压引起的疼痛减轻呈现相似的行为模式。两个治疗组在镇痛效果方面未发现显著差异。对乙酰氨基酚/可待因组的不良反应发生率显著更高(卡方检验:p < 0.05):74例患者中有11例;3例患者不得不停止治疗。在赖氨酸氯尼辛酯组,77例患者中有4例出现副作用,但这些副作用无需停止治疗。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerance of lysine clonixinate versus paracetamol/codeine following inguinal hernioplasty.腹股沟疝修补术后氯尼辛赖氨酸与对乙酰氨基酚/可待因的疗效及耐受性比较
Int J Tissue React. 1998;20(2):71-81.
2
Lysine clonixinate in minor dental surgery: double-blind randomized parallel study versus paracetamol.赖氨酸氯尼辛酯用于小型牙科手术:与对乙酰氨基酚的双盲随机平行对照研究
Int J Tissue React. 1993;15(5):207-13.
3
Lysine clonixinate vs. paracetamol/codeine in postepisiotomy pain.氯尼辛赖氨酸与对乙酰氨基酚/可待因用于会阴切开术后疼痛的比较
Acta Physiol Pharmacol Ther Latinoam. 1998;48(1):52-8.
4
Antispasmodic/analgesic associations in primary dysmenorrhea double-blind crossover placebo-controlled clinical trial.原发性痛经中解痉/镇痛联合用药的双盲交叉安慰剂对照临床试验。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 2001;21(1):21-9.
5
[Menstrual prostaglandin and dysmenorrhea: modulation by non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs].[月经前列腺素与痛经:非甾体抗炎药的调节作用]
Medicina (B Aires). 1999;59(3):259-64.
6
Codeine/acetaminophen and hydrocodone/acetaminophen combination tablets for the management of chronic cancer pain in adults: a 23-day, prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.可待因/对乙酰氨基酚和氢可酮/对乙酰氨基酚复方片剂用于成人慢性癌痛的管理:一项为期23天的前瞻性、双盲、随机、平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):581-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.004.
7
Combination hydrocodone and ibuprofen versus combination codeine and acetaminophen for the treatment of chronic pain.氢可酮与布洛芬联合用药对比可待因与对乙酰氨基酚联合用药治疗慢性疼痛
Clin Ther. 2000 Jul;22(7):879-92. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80060-0.
8
A single-tablet fixed-dose combination of racemic ibuprofen/paracetamol in the management of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain in adult and adolescent patients: a multicenter, two-stage, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, factorial study.在成人和青少年患者中,治疗中重度术后牙科疼痛的消旋布洛芬/扑热息痛单片固定剂量复方制剂:一项多中心、两阶段、随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照、析因研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 Jun;32(6):1033-49. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.002.
9
Analgesia with paracetamol/tramadol vs. paracetamol/codeine in one day-surgery: a randomized open study.一天手术中用对乙酰氨基酚/曲马多与对乙酰氨基酚/可待因进行镇痛:一项随机开放研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Feb;15(2):205-10.
10
A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a scheduled oral analgesic dosing regimen for the management of postoperative pain in children following tonsillectomy.一项关于预定口服镇痛给药方案用于扁桃体切除术后儿童术后疼痛管理有效性的随机临床试验。
Pain. 2004 Jul;110(1-2):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing postoperative pain in adult outpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing codeine with NSAIDs.成人门诊患者术后疼痛管理:比较可待因与 NSAIDs 的系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2021 Jun 14;193(24):E895-E905. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201915.