Pharoah P D, Easton D F, Stockton D L, Gayther S, Ponder B A
Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge Strangeways Research Laboratories, Wort's Causeway, United Kingdom.
Cancer Res. 1999 Feb 15;59(4):868-71.
The natural history of hereditary and BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer may differ from that of sporadic disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated hereditary ovarian cancer, hereditary ovarian cancer with no identified BRCA1/2 mutation, and ovarian cancer in population-based controls. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing was carried out on index cases from 119 families with site-specific epithelial ovarian cancer or breast-ovarian cancer. We estimated overall survival in 151 patients from 57 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation families and compared it with that in 119 patients from 62 families in which a BRCA1/2 mutation was not identified. We compared clinical outcome and data on tumor histopathology, grade, and stage. We also compared survival in familial epithelial ovarian cancer, whether or not a mutation was identified, with that of an age-matched set of population control cases. Overall survival at 5 years was 21% (95% confidence interval, 14-28) in cases from BRCA1 mutation families, 25% (8-42) in BRCA2 mutation families, and 19% (12-26) in families with no identified mutation (P = 0.91). Survival in familial ovarian cancer cases as a whole was significantly worse than for population controls (P = 0.005). In the familial cases, we found no differences in histopathological type, grade, or stage according to mutation status. Compared to population control cases, mucinous tumors occurred less frequently in the familial cases (2 versus 12%, P<0.001), and a greater proportion of the familial cases presented with advanced disease (83% stage III/IV versus 56%; P = 0.001). We have shown that survival in familial ovarian cancer cases is worse than that in sporadic cases, whether or not a BRCA1/2 mutation was identified, perhaps reflecting a difference in biology analogous to that observed in breast cancer.
遗传性以及与BRCA1和BRCA2相关的上皮性卵巢癌的自然病史可能与散发性疾病不同。本研究的目的是比较与BRCA1和BRCA2相关的遗传性卵巢癌、未发现BRCA1/2突变的遗传性卵巢癌以及基于人群对照的卵巢癌的临床特征。对119个患有特定部位上皮性卵巢癌或乳腺-卵巢癌家族的索引病例进行了BRCA1和BRCA2突变检测。我们估计了来自57个BRCA1和BRCA2突变家族的151例患者的总生存期,并将其与来自62个未发现BRCA1/2突变家族的119例患者的总生存期进行了比较。我们比较了临床结局以及肿瘤组织病理学、分级和分期的数据。我们还比较了家族性上皮性卵巢癌(无论是否发现突变)与年龄匹配的一组人群对照病例的生存期。BRCA1突变家族病例的5年总生存率为21%(95%置信区间,14 - 28),BRCA2突变家族为25%(8 - 42),未发现突变家族为19%(12 - 26)(P = 0.91)。家族性卵巢癌病例的总体生存率明显低于人群对照(P = 0.005)。在家族性病例中,根据突变状态,我们未发现组织病理学类型、分级或分期存在差异。与人群对照病例相比,黏液性肿瘤在家族性病例中出现的频率较低(2%对12%,P<0.001),并且家族性病例中更大比例表现为晚期疾病(83%为III/IV期对56%;P = 0.001)。我们已经表明,家族性卵巢癌病例的生存率低于散发性病例,无论是否发现BRCA1/2突变,这可能反映了生物学上的差异,类似于在乳腺癌中观察到的情况。