Obert B, Houllier A, Meyer D, Girma J P
INSERM U.143, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Blood. 1999 Mar 15;93(6):1959-68.
Bitiscetin has recently been shown to induce von Willebrand factor (vWF)-dependent aggregation of fixed platelets (Hamako J, et al, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 226:273, 1996). We have purified bitiscetin from Bitis arietans venom and investigated the mechanism whereby it promotes a form of vWF that is reactive with platelets. In the presence of bitiscetin, vWF binds to platelets in a dose-dependent and saturable manner. The binding of vWF to platelets involves glycoprotein (GP) Ib because it was totally blocked by monoclonal antibody (MoAb) 6D1 directed towards the vWF-binding site of GPIb. The binding also involves the GPIb-binding site of vWF located on the A1 domain because it was inhibited by MoAb to vWF whose epitopes are within this domain and that block binding of vWF to platelets induced by ristocetin or botrocetin. However, in contrast to ristocetin or botrocetin, the binding site of bitiscetin does not reside within the A1 domain but within the A3 domain of vWF. Thus, among a series of vWF fragments, 125I-bitiscetin only binds to those that overlap the A3 domain, ie, SpIII (amino acid [aa] 1-1365), SpI (aa 911-1365), and rvWF-A3 domain (aa 920-1111). It does not bind to SpII corresponding to the C-terminal part of vWF subunit (aa 1366-2050) nor to the 39/34/kD dispase species (aa 480-718) or T116 (aa 449-728) overlapping the A1 domain. In addition, bitiscetin that does not bind to DeltaA3-rvWF (deleted between aa 910-1113) has no binding site ouside the A3 domain. The localization of the binding site of bitiscetin within the A3 domain was further supported by showing that MoAb to vWF, which are specific for this domain and block the interaction between vWF and collagen, are potent inhibitors of the binding of bitiscetin to vWF and consequently of the bitiscetin-induced binding of vWF to platelets. Thus, our data support the hypothesis that an interaction between the A1 and A3 domains exists that may play a role in the function of vWF by regulating the ability of the A1 domain to bind to platelet GPIb.
最近有研究表明,矛头蝮素可诱导固定血小板的血管性血友病因子(vWF)依赖性聚集(滨子J等人,《生物化学与生物物理研究通讯》226:273,1996年)。我们从矛头蝮毒液中纯化了矛头蝮素,并研究了其促进与血小板发生反应的vWF形式的机制。在存在矛头蝮素的情况下,vWF以剂量依赖性和饱和性方式与血小板结合。vWF与血小板的结合涉及糖蛋白(GP)Ib,因为它被针对GPIb的vWF结合位点的单克隆抗体(MoAb)6D1完全阻断。这种结合还涉及位于A1结构域的vWF的GPIb结合位点,因为它被针对vWF的MoAb抑制,这些MoAb的表位在该结构域内,可阻断vWF与瑞斯托菌素或蛇毒凝血酶诱导的血小板结合。然而,与瑞斯托菌素或蛇毒凝血酶不同,矛头蝮素的结合位点不在A1结构域内,而是在vWF的A3结构域内。因此,在一系列vWF片段中,125I-矛头蝮素仅与那些与A3结构域重叠的片段结合,即SpIII(氨基酸[aa]1-1365)、SpI(aa 911-1365)和rvWF-A3结构域(aa 920-1111)。它不与对应于vWF亚基C末端部分的SpII(aa 1366-至2050)结合,也不与与A1结构域重叠的39/34/kD分散酶物种(aa 480-718)或T116(aa 449-728)结合。此外,不与DeltaA3-rvWF(在aa 910-1113之间缺失)结合的矛头蝮素在A3结构域之外没有结合位点。针对vWF的MoAb对矛头蝮素与vWF结合以及因此对矛头蝮素诱导的vWF与血小板结合具有强大的抑制作用,这进一步支持了矛头蝮素结合位点在A3结构域内的定位,这些MoAb对该结构域具有特异性,并可阻断vWF与胶原蛋白之间的相互作用。因此,我们的数据支持这样一种假设,即A1和A3结构域之间存在相互作用,该相互作用可能通过调节A1结构域与血小板GPIb结合的能力在vWF的功能中发挥作用。