Khanna R, Lin X, Watson J C
Department of Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, 46202-5132, USA.
Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jan;39(2):231-42. doi: 10.1023/a:1006154203639.
The PsPK3 and PsPK5 genes of the garden pea encode protein-serine/threonine kinases whose catalytic domains are closely related to known signal transducing kinases from animals and fungi. The PsPK3 polypeptide is predicted to be located in the nucleus, whereas PsPK5 is a homologue of NPH1, the probable blue light receptor for phototropism from Arabidopsis. We found previously that when etiolated pea seedlings are illuminated with continuous white light, PsPK3 and PsPK5 transcript levels within apical buds decline substantially, reaching their minimum levels within one day of exposure to light. The role of light in regulating the expression of the PsPK3 and PsPK5 genes was investigated further. To gain insight into the rapidity with which expression changes, 6-day old, dark-grown pea seedlings were transferred to continuous white light, and PsPK3 and PsPK5 RNA levels monitored over the ensuing 24 h. While transcripts from the RbcS gene family increase, the PsPK3 and PsPK5 mRNAs decline rapidly to their minimum levels. PsPK5 mRNA declines 10-fold in ca. 2 h, whereas PsPK3 mRNA declines 4-fold in ca. 8 h. We used single pulses of light to elucidate which photoreceptor triggers the negative regulation of PsPK3 and PsPK5 gene expression. To assess phytochrome involvement, etiolated seedlings were treated with single pulses of red light, red followed by far-red light, or far-red light alone. RbcS induction by a red light pulse is reversible with a subsequent far-red light pulse, clearly showing that phytochrome mediates its induction. Likewise, RbcS expression is induced with a single pulse of blue light or a dichromatic pulse of red+blue light. However, none of these pulses trigger the PsPK3 and PsPK5 mRNA levels to decline. Given the lack of effectiveness of light pulses, etiolated seedlings were transferred to continuous light of three different qualities to determine the spectral sensitivity of PsPK3 and PsPK5 gene expression. Exposure to continuous red, continuous far-red, or continuous blue light causes the PsPK3 and PsPK5 mRNAs to decline and transcripts from the RbcS and Cab gene families to increase. One likely explanation is that phytochrome A mediates the responses of these genes to continuous far-red light. The effectiveness of continuous red light and blue light in triggering the reduction in PsPK3 and PsPK5 mRNA levels and the increase in RbcS and Cab mRNAs may imply the participation of additional phytochromes and/or cryptochromes. Thus, the PsPK3 and PsPK5 genes exhibit responsiveness to continuous light, but a lack of responsiveness to single light pulses that is unusual, and perhaps unique, among light-regulated genes.
豌豆的PsPK3和PsPK5基因编码蛋白质丝氨酸/苏氨酸激酶,其催化结构域与动物和真菌中已知的信号转导激酶密切相关。预计PsPK3多肽定位于细胞核中,而PsPK5是NPH1的同源物,NPH1可能是拟南芥向光性的蓝光受体。我们之前发现,当黄化豌豆幼苗用连续白光照射时,顶芽内的PsPK3和PsPK5转录水平大幅下降,在光照一天内降至最低水平。进一步研究了光在调节PsPK3和PsPK5基因表达中的作用。为了深入了解表达变化的快速程度,将6天大的黑暗生长豌豆幼苗转移到连续白光下,并在随后的24小时内监测PsPK3和PsPK5的RNA水平。虽然RbcS基因家族的转录本增加,但PsPK3和PsPK5的mRNA迅速下降至最低水平。PsPK5 mRNA在约2小时内下降10倍,而PsPK3 mRNA在约8小时内下降4倍。我们使用单脉冲光来阐明哪种光感受器触发PsPK3和PsPK5基因表达的负调控。为了评估光敏色素的参与情况,用单脉冲红光、红光后接远红光或单独的远红光处理黄化幼苗。红光脉冲对RbcS的诱导可被随后的远红光脉冲逆转,清楚地表明光敏色素介导了其诱导。同样,RbcS表达可由单脉冲蓝光或红+蓝光双色脉冲诱导。然而,这些脉冲均未触发PsPK3和PsPK5 mRNA水平下降。鉴于光脉冲无效,将黄化幼苗转移到三种不同质量的连续光下,以确定PsPK3和PsPK5基因表达的光谱敏感性。暴露于连续红光、连续远红光或连续蓝光会导致PsPK3和PsPK5的mRNA下降,以及RbcS和Cab基因家族的转录本增加。一种可能的解释是,光敏色素A介导了这些基因对连续远红光的反应。连续红光和蓝光在触发PsPK3和PsPK5 mRNA水平降低以及RbcS和Cab mRNA增加方面的有效性可能意味着额外的光敏色素和/或隐花色素的参与。因此,PsPK,3和PsPK5基因对连续光有反应,但对单光脉冲缺乏反应,这在光调节基因中是不寻常的,甚至可能是独特的。