Harbeck N, Ross J S, Yurdseven S, Dettmar P, Pölcher M, Kuhn W, Ulm K, Graeff H, Schmitt M
Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, D-81675 Munich, Germany.
Int J Oncol. 1999 Apr;14(4):663-71. doi: 10.3892/ijo.14.4.663.
In a collective of 112 node-negative breast cancer patients, we compared the prognostic impact of HER-2/neu gene amplification (AMP) determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and HER-2/neu protein overexpression (EXP) measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with traditional prognostic factors (tumor size, grade, steroid hormone receptor status, menopausal status) and tumor invasion markers uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator) and its inhibitor PAI-1 determined by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). Median follow-up in patients still alive at time of analysis was 7 years. Automated FISH and IHC were performed on parallel-cut formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. HER-2/neu AMP was detected by FISH in 31% and HER-2/neu EXP was measured by IHC in 41% of the cases. In 13% of the tumors, both AMP and EXP were found. FISH and IHC results were concordant in 56% of all analyzed cases. In univariate analysis, HER-2/neu AMP significantly predicted both disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). HER-2/neu EXP was significant for OS, only. In multivariate analysis of all analyzed prognostic factors, HER-2/neu AMP was the only independent predictive factor for both DFS and OS. CART analysis revealed that HER-2/neu AMP together with the combination uPA/PAI-1 allowed optimal risk-group assessment after a 7-year median follow-up: patients with low levels of both uPA and PAI-1 and no HER-2/neu AMP had a significantly lower relapse rate (4.6%) than the remaining patients (32%). In conclusion, HER-2/neu gene AMP determined by FISH allowed a more accurate risk-group assessment than HER-2/neu protein EXP measured by IHC. Combining the HER-2/neu gene status measured by FISH with levels of tumor invasion markers uPA and PAI-1 improves clinically relevant risk-group assessment. In addition to its prognostic strength, the significant impact of HER-2/neu AMP on OS may reflect its ability to predict resistance to systemic therapy.
在一个由112例淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者组成的队列中,我们将通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测的HER-2/neu基因扩增(AMP)以及通过免疫组织化学(IHC)测定的HER-2/neu蛋白过表达(EXP)的预后影响,与传统预后因素(肿瘤大小、分级、类固醇激素受体状态、绝经状态)以及通过酶免疫测定(ELISA)测定的肿瘤侵袭标志物uPA(尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂)及其抑制剂PAI-1进行了比较。在分析时仍存活的患者中,中位随访时间为7年。在平行切割的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织切片上进行自动FISH和IHC检测。31%的病例通过FISH检测到HER-2/neu AMP,41%的病例通过IHC检测到HER-2/neu EXP。在13%的肿瘤中,同时发现了AMP和EXP。在所有分析病例中,FISH和IHC结果的一致性为56%。在单因素分析中,HER-2/neu AMP显著预测了无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。HER-2/neu EXP仅对OS有显著意义。在对所有分析的预后因素进行多因素分析时,HER-2/neu AMP是DFS和OS的唯一独立预测因素。CART分析显示,在中位随访7年后,HER-2/neu AMP与uPA/PAI-1组合能够实现最佳的风险组评估:uPA和PAI-1水平均低且无HER-2/neu AMP的患者复发率(4.6%)显著低于其余患者(32%)。总之,与通过IHC测定的HER-2/neu蛋白EXP相比,通过FISH检测的HER-2/neu基因AMP能够进行更准确的风险组评估。将通过FISH测定的HER-2/neu基因状态与肿瘤侵袭标志物uPA和PAI-1的水平相结合,可改善临床相关的风险组评估。除了其预后强度外,HER-2/neu AMP对OS的显著影响可能反映了其预测对全身治疗耐药性的能力。