Freeman J L
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03756.
Health Policy. 1991 Mar;17(2):151-64. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90051-x.
DRGs have recently been revised to account for severity of illness through a more refined use of additional diagnoses (comorbidities and complications). Under the refined model, patients are differentiated with respect to classes of additional diagnoses that are disease and procedure specific. The Refined DRGs were evaluated with data from selected Barcelona hospitals and the findings compared to those obtained with Norwegian and English hospital discharge information. In terms of predictive performance, the Refined DRGs represent only a very small improvement over the second revision DRGs for the study's sample of European data. This lack of significant improvement is likely attributed to misclassification of the European discharges due to limited reporting of additional diagnoses. It is recommended that European countries use the Refined DRGs as a descriptive framework for reporting utilization statistics in order to encourage more complete reporting of comorbidities and complications.
诊断相关分组(DRGs)最近进行了修订,通过更精细地使用额外诊断(共病和并发症)来考量疾病的严重程度。在改进后的模型中,根据特定疾病和手术的额外诊断类别对患者进行区分。利用巴塞罗那部分医院的数据对改进后的DRGs进行了评估,并将结果与挪威和英国医院出院信息得出的结果进行了比较。在预测性能方面,对于该研究的欧洲数据样本,改进后的DRGs相比第二次修订版DRGs仅略有改进。这种缺乏显著改进的情况可能归因于由于额外诊断报告有限导致欧洲出院病例分类错误。建议欧洲国家将改进后的DRGs用作报告利用统计数据的描述性框架,以鼓励更全面地报告共病和并发症。