Davies M
Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK.
Health Libr Rev. 1994 Sep;11(3):183-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.1994.1130183.x.
This paper arises from a longitudinal study concerning the impact of information technology developments on the information handling techniques of research (laboratory and clinical) scientists from the perspective of perceived value or benefit based on subjective evaluation by users. The project's main method of data collection is the semi-structured interview utilizing samples from various categories of Imperial Cancer Research Fund (ICRF) staff plus a composite external comparison group. This method is complemented by analyses of Library and Information Services Department's (LIS's) records (particularly statistics of database usage and requests relating to document supply) and, where possible, indications of other software usage (to provide further background to the degree of electronic activity of users). This paper focuses on the ICRF staff sample only and reports selected results obtained from interviews during the first phase of the project, October 1992-September 1993, which give preliminary indications of the information handling techniques of research scientists at that time.
本文源自一项纵向研究,该研究从用户主观评估的感知价值或益处的角度,探讨信息技术发展对研究(实验室和临床)科学家信息处理技术的影响。该项目主要的数据收集方法是半结构化访谈,访谈对象包括来自帝国癌症研究基金会(ICRF)各类人员的样本以及一个综合外部对照组。通过分析图书馆与信息服务部(LIS)的记录(特别是数据库使用统计数据和与文献供应相关的请求),并在可能的情况下分析其他软件的使用情况(以进一步了解用户的电子活动程度),对上述方法进行补充。本文仅关注ICRF人员样本,并报告了在1992年10月至1993年9月项目第一阶段期间从访谈中获得的部分结果,这些结果初步显示了当时研究科学家的信息处理技术。