Bickman L
Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
J Ment Health Adm. 1996 Winter;23(1):107-17. doi: 10.1007/BF02518647.
This article summarizes the major findings of the Fort Bragg Evaluation and considers alternative explanations for the results. The evaluation found that the continuum of care provided a high-quality system of care but was more expensive and produced no better clinical outcomes than traditional services. The possibility of implementation failure at both the systems and services levels is considered and rejected as an explanation for the results. Support for the validity of the measurement, design, and the analysis is also presented. The implications for research and policy are described.
本文总结了布拉格堡评估的主要发现,并对结果的其他解释进行了考量。评估发现,连续护理提供了一个高质量的护理体系,但比传统服务成本更高,且临床结果并无改善。文中考虑并否定了在系统和服务层面实施失败作为结果解释的可能性。同时还提供了对测量、设计和分析有效性的支持。最后阐述了对研究和政策的启示。