初级卫生保健、社区参与和社区筹资:尼泊尔两个中山村庄的经验

Primary health care, community participation and community-financing: experiences of two middle hill villages in Nepal.

作者信息

Sepehri A, Pettigrew J

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 1996 Mar;11(1):93-100. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.93.

Abstract

Although community involvement in health related activities is generally acknowledged by international and national health planners to be the key to the successful organization of primary health care, comparatively little is known about its potential and limitations. Drawing on the experiences of two middle hill villages in Nepal, this paper reports on research undertaken to compare and contrast the scope and extent of community participation in the delivery of primary health care in a community run and financed health post and a state run and financed health post. Unlike many other health posts in Nepal these facilities do provide effective curative services, and neither of them suffer from chronic shortage of drugs. However, community-financing did not appear to widen the scope and the extent of participation. Villagers in both communities relied on the health post for the treatment of less than one-third of symptoms, and despite the planners' intentions, community involvement outside participation in benefits was found to be very limited.

摘要

尽管国际和国家卫生规划者普遍承认社区参与健康相关活动是成功组织初级卫生保健的关键,但对其潜力和局限性却知之甚少。本文借鉴尼泊尔两个中山村庄的经验,报告了一项研究,旨在比较和对比社区经营和资助的卫生站与国营和资助的卫生站在提供初级卫生保健方面社区参与的范围和程度。与尼泊尔许多其他卫生站不同,这些设施确实提供有效的治疗服务,而且它们都不存在长期药品短缺的问题。然而,社区融资似乎并没有扩大参与的范围和程度。两个社区的村民依靠卫生站治疗的症状不到三分之一,而且尽管规划者有这样的意图,但发现除了参与福利之外的社区参与非常有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索