Eddy J M, Fitzhugh E C, Wojtowicz G G, Wang M Q
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487-0312, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 1997 Mar-Apr;11(4):281-9. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.4.281.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of the research that examines the effectiveness of worksite intervention programs designed to increase the use of safety belts by employees.
The literature search, which identified 14 research studies on worksite safety belt programs conducted between 1968 and 1994, originated as part of a larger review on the health impact of worksite health promotion programs that was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In addition, the authors conducted an additional search in an effort to validate the CDC search, but found no additional research articles.
The literature specific to the effectiveness of safety belt programs is limited to only 14 studies. The safety belt intervention most commonly evaluated used behavioral modification principles involving incentives. These and other interventions demonstrated effective increases in seat belt utilization that, upon withdrawal of the intervention, achieved a recidivism rate above baseline levels. However, the vast majority of studies failed to incorporate control groups into their research design, which caused significant threats to internal validity. Thus, a summary of findings is only suggestive at best.
Based on the literature, there appears to be an insufficient number of quality research studies from which to derive a clear view of the impact of worksite safety belt programs. While the evidence is suggestive of a positive impact on safety belt use, there is a clear need for new, well-designed research initiatives on the effectiveness of theory-based safety belt intervention programs.
本文旨在对旨在提高员工安全带使用率的工作场所干预项目的有效性相关研究进行文献综述。
文献检索确定了1968年至1994年间开展的14项关于工作场所安全带项目的研究,该检索是疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)对工作场所健康促进项目的健康影响进行的一项更大规模综述的一部分。此外,作者进行了额外检索以验证CDC的检索结果,但未发现其他研究文章。
关于安全带项目有效性的文献仅局限于14项研究。最常评估的安全带干预措施采用了涉及激励措施的行为改变原则。这些及其他干预措施表明安全带使用率有效提高,然而在干预措施撤销后,复发率高于基线水平。但是,绝大多数研究在其研究设计中未纳入对照组,这对内部效度造成了重大威胁。因此,研究结果总结充其量只是具有启发性。
基于现有文献,似乎没有足够数量的高质量研究来清晰了解工作场所安全带项目的影响。虽然证据表明对安全带使用有积极影响,但显然需要开展新的、精心设计的关于基于理论的安全带干预项目有效性的研究。