Reisenauer A, Quon K, Shapiro L
Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5329, USA.
J Bacteriol. 1999 Apr;181(8):2430-9. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.8.2430-2439.1999.
In its role as a global response regulator, CtrA controls the transcription of a diverse group of genes at different times in the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle. To understand the differential regulation of CtrA-controlled genes, we compared the expression of two of these genes, the fliQ flagellar gene and the ccrM DNA methyltransferase gene. Despite their similar promoter architecture, these genes are transcribed at different times in the cell cycle. PfliQ is activated earlier than PccrM. Phosphorylated CtrA (CtrA approximately P) bound to the CtrA recognition sequence in both promoters but had a 10- to 20-fold greater affinity for PfliQ. This difference in affinity correlates with temporal changes in the cellular levels of CtrA. Disrupting a unique inverted repeat element in PccrM significantly reduced promoter activity but not the timing of transcription initiation, suggesting that the inverted repeat does not play a major role in the temporal control of ccrM expression. Our data indicate that differences in the affinity of CtrA approximately P for PfliQ and PccrM regulate, in part, the temporal expression of these genes. However, the timing of fliQ transcription but not of ccrM transcription was altered in cells expressing a stable CtrA derivative, indicating that changes in CtrA approximately P levels alone cannot govern the cell cycle transcription of these genes. We propose that changes in the cellular concentration of CtrA approximately P and its interaction with accessory proteins influence the temporal expression of fliQ, ccrM, and other key cell cycle genes and ultimately the regulation of the cell cycle.
作为一种全局响应调节因子,CtrA在新月柄杆菌细胞周期的不同时间控制着多种基因的转录。为了理解CtrA控制基因的差异调节,我们比较了其中两个基因的表达,即鞭毛基因fliQ和DNA甲基转移酶基因ccrM。尽管它们的启动子结构相似,但这些基因在细胞周期的不同时间转录。PfliQ比PccrM更早被激活。磷酸化的CtrA(CtrAP)与两个启动子中的CtrA识别序列结合,但对PfliQ的亲和力比对PccrM高10到20倍。这种亲和力的差异与细胞中CtrA水平的时间变化相关。破坏PccrM中一个独特的反向重复元件显著降低了启动子活性,但没有改变转录起始的时间,这表明反向重复在ccrM表达的时间控制中不发挥主要作用。我们的数据表明,CtrAP对PfliQ和PccrM亲和力的差异部分调节了这些基因的时间表达。然而,在表达稳定CtrA衍生物的细胞中,fliQ转录的时间发生了改变,而ccrM转录的时间没有改变,这表明仅CtrAP水平的变化不能控制这些基因的细胞周期转录。我们提出,细胞中CtrAP浓度的变化及其与辅助蛋白的相互作用影响fliQ、ccrM和其他关键细胞周期基因的时间表达,并最终影响细胞周期的调节。