Summers B A, Overholt J L, Prabhakar N R
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4970, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;81(4):1449-57. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1449.
Previous studies have shown that nitric oxide (NO) inhibits carotid body sensory activity. To begin to understand the cellular mechanisms associated with the actions of NO in the carotid body, we monitored the effects of NO donors on the macroscopic Ca2+ current in glomus cells isolated from rabbit carotid bodies. Experiments were performed on freshly dissociated glomus cells from adult rabbit carotid bodies using the whole cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. The NO donors sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 600 microM, n = 7) and spermine nitric oxide (SNO; 100 microM, n = 7) inhibited the Ca2+ current in glomus cells in a voltage-independent manner. These effects of NO donors were rapid in onset and peaked within 1 or 2 min. In contrast, the outward K+ current was unaffected by SNP (600 microM, n = 6), indicating that the inhibition by SNP was not a nonspecific membrane effect. 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5, 5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (carboxy-PTIO; 500 microM), an NO scavenger, prevented inhibition of the Ca2+ current by SNP (n = 7), whereas neither superoxide dismutase (SOD; 2,000 U/ml, n = 4), a superoxide scavenger, nor sodium hydrosulfite (SHS; 1 mM, n = 7), a reducing agent, prevented inhibition of the Ca2+ current by SNP. However, SNP inhibition of the Ca2+ current was reversible in the presence of either SOD or SHS. These results suggest that NO itself inhibits Ca2+ current in a reversible manner and that subsequent formation of peroxynitrites results in irreversible inhibition. SNP inhibition of the Ca2+ current was not affected by 30 microM LY 83, 583 (n = 7) nor was it mimicked by 600 microM 8-bromoguanosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-Br-cGMP; n = 6), suggesting that the effects of NO on the Ca2+ current are mediated, in part, via a cGMP-independent mechanism. N-ethylmaleimide (NEM; 2.5 mM, n = 6) prevented the inhibition of the Ca2+ current by SNP, indicating that SNP is acting via a modification of sulfhydryl groups on Ca2+ channel proteins. Norepinephrine (NE; 10 microM) further inhibited the Ca2+ current in the presence of NEM (n = 7), implying that NEM did not nonspecifically eliminate Ca2+ current modulation. Nisoldipine, an L-type Ca2+ channel blocker (2 microM, n = 6), prevented the inhibition of Ca2+ current by SNP, whereas omega-conotoxin GVIA, an N-type Ca2+ channel blocker (1 microM, n = 9), did not prevent the inhibition of Ca2+ current by SNP. These results demonstrate that NO inhibits L-type Ca2+ channels in adult rabbit glomus cells, in part, due to a modification of calcium channel proteins. The inhibition might provide one plausible mechanism for efferent inhibition of carotid body activity by NO.
以往的研究表明,一氧化氮(NO)可抑制颈动脉体的感觉活动。为了初步了解与NO在颈动脉体中作用相关的细胞机制,我们监测了NO供体对从兔颈动脉体分离的球细胞中宏观Ca2+电流的影响。使用膜片钳技术的全细胞配置,对成年兔颈动脉体新鲜解离的球细胞进行了实验。NO供体硝普钠(SNP;600 microM,n = 7)和精胺一氧化氮(SNO;100 microM,n = 7)以电压非依赖性方式抑制球细胞中的Ca2+电流。NO供体的这些作用起效迅速,在1或2分钟内达到峰值。相比之下,外向K+电流不受SNP(600 microM,n = 6)的影响,表明SNP的抑制作用不是非特异性膜效应。NO清除剂2-(4-羧基苯基)-4,4,5,5-四甲基咪唑啉-1-氧基-3-氧化物(羧基-PTIO;500 microM)可防止SNP对Ca2+电流的抑制作用(n = 7),而超氧化物清除剂超氧化物歧化酶(SOD;2000 U/ml,n = 4)和还原剂亚硫酸氢钠(SHS;1 mM,n = 7)均不能防止SNP对Ca2+电流的抑制作用。然而,在SOD或SHS存在的情况下,SNP对Ca2+电流的抑制作用是可逆的。这些结果表明,NO本身以可逆方式抑制Ca2+电流,随后过氧亚硝酸盐的形成导致不可逆抑制。SNP对Ca2+电流的抑制作用不受30 microM LY 83,583(n = 7)的影响也未被600 microM 8-溴鸟苷3':5'-环一磷酸(8-Br-cGMP;n = 6)模拟,这表明NO对Ca2+电流的影响部分是通过非cGMP依赖机制介导的。N-乙基马来酰亚胺(NEM;2.5 mM,n = 6)可防止SNP对Ca2+电流的抑制作用,表明SNP是通过修饰Ca2+通道蛋白上的巯基起作用的。去甲肾上腺素(NE;10 microM)在NEM存在的情况下进一步抑制Ca2+电流(n = 7),这意味着NEM不会非特异性消除Ca2+电流调节。L型Ca2+通道阻滞剂尼索地平(2 microM,n = 6)可防止SNP对Ca2+电流的抑制作用,而N型Ca2+通道阻滞剂ω-芋螺毒素GVIA(1 microM,n = 9)不能防止SNP对Ca2+电流的抑制作用。这些结果表明,NO部分通过修饰钙通道蛋白来抑制成年兔球细胞中的L型Ca2+通道。这种抑制作用可能为NO对颈动脉体活动的传出抑制提供一种合理的机制。