O'Carroll R E, Drysdale E, Cahill L, Shajahan P, Ebmeier K P
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 1999;13(1):32-9. doi: 10.1177/026988119901300104.
The connection between affect and memory is poorly understood. A possible psychopharmacological linking mechanism is the sympathetic arousal that occurs in response to threatening or emotive material. Cahill et al. (1994) reported that a single administration of 40 mg propranolol hydrochloride, a non-selective beta-adrenergic blocker, to healthy young adults significantly reduced delayed recall of emotive material, with recall of matched neutral material unaffected. This study differed importantly from the original Cahill et al. (1994) procedure in that only the emotionally arousing narrative was employed. Using the same slide presentation as Cahill et al. (1994), an experiment was carried out in order to determine whether beta-adrenergic blockade significantly reduces recall of emotive material via a central or peripheral mode of action. Thirty-six healthy young adults were recruited as subjects. Subjects were randomly allocated to three groups: (a) placebo (b) 40 mg propranolol hydrochloride (a beta blocker which readily crosses the blood brain barrier) and (c) 40 mg nadolol (a beta blocker which does not cross the blood-brain barrier). The three groups were matched for age, sex, intelligence, personality factors, and general memory functioning. Subjects viewed a series of 11 slides accompanied by a narrative, divisible into three phases. The emotionally arousing component of the narrative was introduced during phase II. Both central and peripheral beta blockade produced the expected effects on the sympathetic nervous system, as demonstrated by reliable reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In a surprise memory test 1 week later, subjects were asked to recall as much as possible of the story and slides, and also completed a forced choice recognition memory test. All three groups showed heightened recall and recognition for the central (emotive) section of the story. There was no differential effect of beta blockade (either central or peripheral) relative to placebo. Beta blockade markedly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but resulted in no significant effect on memory for both emotional and neutral material.
情感与记忆之间的联系尚未得到充分理解。一种可能的心理药理学联系机制是对威胁性或情感性材料做出反应时出现的交感神经兴奋。卡希尔等人(1994年)报告称,给健康的年轻成年人单次服用40毫克盐酸普萘洛尔(一种非选择性β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂),可显著降低对情感性材料的延迟回忆,而对匹配的中性材料的回忆则不受影响。这项研究与卡希尔等人(1994年)的原始程序有重要不同之处,即仅采用了情感唤起性叙述。使用与卡希尔等人(1994年)相同的幻灯片展示,进行了一项实验,以确定β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂是否通过中枢或外周作用模式显著降低对情感性材料的回忆。招募了36名健康的年轻成年人作为受试者。受试者被随机分为三组:(a)安慰剂组;(b)40毫克盐酸普萘洛尔组(一种容易穿过血脑屏障的β阻滞剂);(c)40毫克纳多洛尔组(一种不能穿过血脑屏障的β阻滞剂)。三组在年龄、性别、智力、人格因素和一般记忆功能方面进行了匹配。受试者观看了一系列11张配有叙述的幻灯片,该叙述可分为三个阶段。叙述中的情感唤起部分在第二阶段引入。中枢和外周β阻断对交感神经系统均产生了预期效果,收缩压和舒张压可靠降低证明了这一点。在1周后的一次意外记忆测试中,要求受试者尽可能多地回忆故事和幻灯片内容,并且还完成了一项强制选择识别记忆测试。所有三组对故事的核心(情感)部分的回忆和识别都有所增强。相对于安慰剂,β阻断(无论是中枢性还是外周性)没有差异效应。β阻断显著降低了收缩压和舒张压,但对情感性和中性材料的记忆均未产生显著影响。