Suppr超能文献

空腹血糖受损并非动脉粥样硬化的危险因素。

Impaired fasting glucose is not a risk factor for atherosclerosis.

作者信息

Hanefeld M, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T, Schaper F, Henkel E, Siegert G, Koehler C

机构信息

Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Clinical Metabolic Research, Technical University of Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 1999 Mar;16(3):212-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00072.x.

Abstract

AIM

To determine a new category of dysfunctional glucose homeostasis - impaired fasting glucose (IFG) - introduced by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) defining those with abnormal but nondiabetic fasting glucose values and with a possible risk for developing diabetes. It is not known whether IFG is a risk factor for atherosclerosis, as is impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).

METHODS

In this case-control cross-sectional study in which the oral glucose tolerance (75-g OGTT) and the carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) with B mode ultrasound, as a marker of atherosclerosis, were measured, together with HbA1c, lipids, plasminogen activator (PAI), insulin and proinsulin concentrations in blood plasma. Out of 788 subjects of the risk factors in IGT for Atherosclerosis and Diabetes (RIAD) study we found 104 IFG cases that were compared to 104 controls with fasting plasma glucose (FPG)<6.1 mmol/l, matched for age, sex and body mass index. Subjects with 2h postprandial (pp) plasma glucose > or = 11.1 mmol/l were excluded. The rest were subdivided into those with 2h plasma glucose < 7.8 mmol/l (63 pairs, NGT) and those with plasma glucose > 7.8 mmol/l and < 11.1 mmol/l (41 pairs, IGT).

RESULTS

The case and control groups showed no significant differences in the major risk factors except for waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) which was higher in the IFG with NGT. IFG with NGT exhibited significantly higher levels of HbA1c, true insulin and proinsulin. In IFG with IGT, only HbA1c and proinsulin were significantly increased vs. controls. IMT was in the same range for cases and controls in both subgroups. However, IMT mean and IMTmax were significantly increased in IFG with IGT vs. IFG with NGT (0.95 mm vs. 0.80 mm and 1.10 mm vs. 0.90 mm). Cumulative distribution analysis of IMT illustrates that IMT in IFG with IGT is more shifted to higher artery wall thickness than in IFG with NGT.

CONCLUSIONS

In our case-control study IFG alone was not related to increased IMT. Only IFG in a combination with IGT exhibited atherosclerotic changes of the carotid arteries. IFG is not analogous to IGT as a risk factor for atherosclerosis.

摘要

目的

确定一种新的血糖稳态功能障碍类型——空腹血糖受损(IFG),这是由美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和世界卫生组织(WHO)提出的,用于定义那些空腹血糖值异常但未患糖尿病且可能有患糖尿病风险的人群。目前尚不清楚IFG是否像糖耐量受损(IGT)一样是动脉粥样硬化的危险因素。

方法

在这项病例对照横断面研究中,测量了口服葡萄糖耐量试验(75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验)和用B型超声测量的颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT),作为动脉粥样硬化的标志物,同时还测量了血浆中的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血脂、纤溶酶原激活物(PAI)、胰岛素和胰岛素原浓度。在动脉粥样硬化和糖尿病IGT危险因素(RIAD)研究的788名受试者中,我们发现了104例IFG病例,并将其与104名空腹血糖(FPG)<6.1 mmol/l的对照者进行比较,这些对照者在年龄、性别和体重指数方面相匹配。排除餐后2小时(pp)血浆葡萄糖≥11.1 mmol/l的受试者。其余受试者被分为餐后2小时血浆葡萄糖<7.8 mmol/l的(63对,正常糖耐量组)和血浆葡萄糖>7.8 mmol/l且<11.1 mmol/l的(41对,IGT组)。

结果

病例组和对照组在主要危险因素方面无显著差异,除了腰臀比(WHR),在正常糖耐量的IFG组中更高。正常糖耐量的IFG组的HbA1c、真胰岛素和胰岛素原水平显著更高。在IGT的IFG组中,与对照组相比,只有HbA1c和胰岛素原显著升高。两个亚组中病例组和对照组的IMT处于相同范围。然而,IGT的IFG组的IMT平均值和IMT最大值与正常糖耐量的IFG组相比显著增加(0.95毫米对0.80毫米和1.10毫米对0.90毫米)。IMT的累积分布分析表明,IGT的IFG组的IMT比正常糖耐量的IFG组更倾向于更高的动脉壁厚度。

结论

在我们的病例对照研究中,单独的IFG与IMT增加无关。只有IFG与IGT同时存在时才表现出颈动脉的动脉粥样硬化改变。IFG作为动脉粥样硬化的危险因素与IGT不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验