Suppr超能文献

与原发性胆汁性肝硬化死亡患者实际生存相关的主要临床事件、体征及严重程度评估分数。一项长期历史性队列研究。

Major clinical events, signs and severity assessment scores related to actual survival in patients who died from primary biliary cirrhosis. A long-term historical cohort study.

作者信息

van Dam G M, Gips C H, Reisman Y, Maas K W, Purmer I M, Huizenga J R, Verbaan B W

机构信息

International School of Hepatology and Tropical Medicine GISH-T, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Jan-Feb;46(25):108-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: One of the prognostic methods for survival in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is the Mayo model, with a time-scale limited to 7 years. The aim of our study was to assess how major clinical events, signs, several severity assessment methods and Mayo survival probabilities fit in with actual patient survival, by using yearly observations until 0.5 years before patient death from PBC.

METHODOLOGY

Data of 32 patients dying from PBC were collected prior to death at -0.5, -1, -2 etc. years (median: -5 years, range: -16 to -0.5 years). Major events registered were: first occurrence of ascites, upper gastrointestinal bleeding or manifest hepatic encephalopathy and signs, first observation of spider naevi or purpura. Severity assessment methods applied (all with scores and classes) were: Mayo (M), Child-Campbell (C), Pugh-Child (P), Pugh-Child-PBC (PP), 'Child-Pugh' (CP), and Ascites Nutritional State-Child (ANS). Fifty percent survival estimates were calculated from Mayo scores. Severity assessment method variables were: ascites (C, P, PP, CP, ANS), encephalopathy (C, P, PP, CP), nutritional state (C, ANS), edema (M), age (M), serum albumin (M, C, P, PP, CP), bilirubin (C, M, P, PP, CP), and prothrombin time (M, P, PP, CP).

RESULTS

In 27 out of 32 patients a major event occurred, always between -6 and -0.5 years (median: -1 year) and, never between -16 and -7 years (p < 0.0001). A sign was first observed in 30/32 between -14 and -0.5 years (median: -2 years). Compared to the total population, a sign, and even more so, an event indicated a shorter survival (p = 0.004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). The median 50% estimated survival (predicted by the Mayo model) fitted the actual survival from -6 to -0.5 years (r = -0.7, p < 0.0001), but not from -16 to -7 years (r = -0.1, p = 0.4). All -6 to -0.5-year severity scores correlated (p < 0.0001) both with actual survival (M, C, P, PP, and CP r = 0.7; ANS r = 0.5) and with estimated M 50% survival (C, P, PP, CP r = -0.9; ANS r = -0.6; M score: -0.99), but none with actual survival from -16 to -7 years, except for M, slightly (r = -0.3, p = 0.04). A nomogram for mean C, CP, M and ANS scores related to actual survival was constructed for the -6 to -0.5-year period. The C and CP classes A, B, and C did not appear to distinguish sufficiently into actual survival, whereas the M classes did.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of a major event appeared to exclude survival over 6 years. In these final 6 years, Child-Campbell, Mayo and Pugh scores correlated equally well with actual survival and better than Ascites/Nutritional State score. In our PBC patients, Campbell was an excellent alternative for Pugh; for Pugh, the original Child-Turcotte variable limits were fully sufficient.

摘要

背景/目的:原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者生存预后评估方法之一是梅奥模型,其时间范围限制在7年。本研究的目的是通过对PBC患者死亡前0.5年的逐年观察,评估主要临床事件、体征、几种严重程度评估方法以及梅奥生存概率与患者实际生存情况的契合程度。

方法

收集32例死于PBC患者在死亡前-0.5、-1、-2等年份(中位数:-5年,范围:-16至-0.5年)的数据。记录的主要事件包括:首次出现腹水、上消化道出血或明显的肝性脑病及体征,首次观察到蜘蛛痣或紫癜。应用的严重程度评估方法(均有评分和分级)包括:梅奥(M)、Child-Campbell(C)、Pugh-Child(P)、Pugh-Child-PBC(PP)、“Child-Pugh”(CP)以及腹水营养状态-Child(ANS)。根据梅奥评分计算50%生存估计值。严重程度评估方法变量包括:腹水(C、P、PP、CP、ANS)、脑病(C、P、PP、CP)、营养状态(C、ANS)、水肿(M)、年龄(M)、血清白蛋白(M、C、P、PP、CP)、胆红素(C、M、P、PP、CP)以及凝血酶原时间(M、P、PP、CP)。

结果

32例患者中有27例发生了主要事件,均发生在-6至-0.5年之间(中位数:-1年),且从未发生在-16至-7年之间(p<0.0001)。32例中有30例在-14至-0.5年之间(中位数:-2年)首次观察到体征。与总体人群相比,体征,尤其是事件提示生存时间较短(分别为p = 0.004和p = 0.0002)。梅奥模型预测的50%生存估计中位数在-6至-0.5年与实际生存情况相符(r = -0.7,p<0.0001),但在-16至-7年则不相符(r = -0.1,p = 0.4)。所有-至-0.5年的严重程度评分与实际生存情况(M、C、P、PP和CP的r = 0.7;ANS的r = 0.5)以及估计的梅奥50%生存情况(C、P、PP、CP的r = -0.9;ANS的r = -0.6;M评分:-0.99)均相关(p<0.0001),但在-16至-7年,除M评分与实际生存情况有轻微相关性(r = -0.3,p = 0.04)外,其他评分均无相关性。构建了-6至-0.5年期间平均C、CP、M和ANS评分与实际生存情况相关的列线图。C和CP分级的A、B和C级在区分实际生存情况方面似乎不够充分,而M分级则可以。

结论

主要事件的发生似乎排除了超过6年的生存可能。在这最后的6年中,Child-Campbell、梅奥和Pugh评分与实际生存情况的相关性同样良好,且优于腹水/营养状态评分。在我们的PBC患者中,Campbell是Pugh的一个极佳替代方法;对于Pugh而言,最初的Child-Turcotte变量限制就已足够。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验