Huang Y W, Hamilton A, Arnuk O J, Chaftari P, Chemaly R
Department of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, New York 10305, USA.
Drugs. 1999 Apr;57(4):485-506. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957040-00004.
Recent years have witnessed tremendous advances in the molecular pathogenesis and management of multiple myeloma. Standard chemotherapy (melphalan and prednisone; MP) has been the mainstay of treatment of multiple myeloma for about 3 decades. However, it is no longer considered the 'gold standard', particularly for those patients who will subsequently undergo intensive chemotherapy with autologous or allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT), or for patients with refractory myeloma. A variety of induction combination chemotherapy regimens have been developed, some of which have demonstrated an improved response rate and duration and a superior 5-year survival rate when compared with standard chemotherapy. The early use of high dose chemotherapy with autologous PBSC support or BMT has significantly increased the complete remission rate, and has prolonged event-free sur vival and overall survival. Allogeneic bone marrow or PBSC transplantation may be a good option for selected patients with poor prognostic features. The role of interferon-alpha in multiple myeloma is still inconclusive despite many years of clinical evaluation. The clinical application of chemosensitising agents that can inhibit P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression and function, and particularly the development of more potent P-gp modulators such as valspodar (PSC 833) and elacridar (GF120918) has made it possible to reverse multidrug resistance in some refractory patients and to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. Immunotherapeutic approaches to purging of autologous bone marrow or PBSC, or as adjuvant therapy for minimal residual disease, show great promise. Finally, a number of new therapies specifically designed to treat many of the complications of multiple myeloma are improving clinical outcomes and quality of life for these patients.
近年来,多发性骨髓瘤的分子发病机制和治疗方面取得了巨大进展。标准化疗(美法仑和泼尼松;MP)在约30年的时间里一直是多发性骨髓瘤治疗的主要手段。然而,它已不再被视为“金标准”,特别是对于那些随后将接受自体或异基因外周血干细胞(PBSC)或骨髓移植(BMT)强化化疗的患者,或难治性骨髓瘤患者。已开发出多种诱导联合化疗方案,其中一些方案与标准化疗相比,显示出更高的缓解率和缓解持续时间以及更高的5年生存率。早期使用高剂量化疗并辅以自体PBSC支持或BMT,显著提高了完全缓解率,并延长了无事件生存期和总生存期。异基因骨髓或PBSC移植可能是某些预后不良特征患者的一个好选择。尽管经过多年临床评估,α干扰素在多发性骨髓瘤中的作用仍不明确。能够抑制P-糖蛋白(P-gp)表达和功能的化疗增敏剂的临床应用,特别是更有效的P-gp调节剂如valspodar(PSC 833)和elacridar(GF120918)的开发,使得在一些难治性患者中逆转多药耐药并提高化疗药物疗效成为可能。用于清除自体骨髓或PBSC的免疫治疗方法,或作为微小残留病的辅助治疗,显示出巨大的前景。最后,一些专门设计用于治疗多发性骨髓瘤许多并发症的新疗法正在改善这些患者的临床结局和生活质量。