Peer review--a study of reliability.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Ceci S J, Peters D P

出版信息

Change. 1982 Sep;14(6):44-8. doi: 10.1080/00091383.1982.10569910.

DOI:10.1080/00091383.1982.10569910

PMID:10259866

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Peer review--a study of reliability.

Change. 1982 Sep;14(6):44-8. doi: 10.1080/00091383.1982.10569910.

Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1599. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09com05624whi.

Peer review in early career: just say yes!

J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1602-3. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09com05630whi.

Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1600-1. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09com05635whi.

Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.020.

Peer Review of Scholarly Work.

Adv Neonatal Care. 2018 Dec;18(6):423-424. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000574.

The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice.

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Apr;40:v. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

Peer review and accountability.

Can J Nurs Res. 1991 Summer;23(2):1-5.

Peer review of medical journals: safeguarding the patient.

Orthopedics. 1990 May;13(5):505. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19900501-05.

[Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].

Rev Invest Clin. 2000 Jan-Feb;52(1):52-9.

引用本文的文献

Prestige bias--an old, untreated enemy of the peer-review process.

Hippokratia. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2):94.

The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.

High Educ (Dordr). 2021;82(1):145-162. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00626-y. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179031. eCollection 2017.

Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation.

Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Dec 14;5:56. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00056. eCollection 2011.

Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.

Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):5-12.

Parafraud in biology.

Sci Eng Ethics. 1997 Apr;3(2):121-36. doi: 10.1007/s11948-997-0003-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Peer review--a study of reliability.

Change. 1982 Sep;14(6):44-8. doi: 10.1080/00091383.1982.10569910.

Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1599. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09com05624whi.

Peer review in early career: just say yes!

J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1602-3. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09com05630whi.

Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1600-1. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09com05635whi.

Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.020.

Peer Review of Scholarly Work.

Adv Neonatal Care. 2018 Dec;18(6):423-424. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000574.

The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice.

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Apr;40:v. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

Peer review and accountability.

Can J Nurs Res. 1991 Summer;23(2):1-5.

Peer review of medical journals: safeguarding the patient.

Orthopedics. 1990 May;13(5):505. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19900501-05.

[Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].

Rev Invest Clin. 2000 Jan-Feb;52(1):52-9.

引用本文的文献

Prestige bias--an old, untreated enemy of the peer-review process.

Hippokratia. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2):94.

The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.

High Educ (Dordr). 2021;82(1):145-162. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00626-y. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179031. eCollection 2017.

Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation.

Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Dec 14;5:56. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00056. eCollection 2011.

Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.

Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):5-12.

Parafraud in biology.

Sci Eng Ethics. 1997 Apr;3(2):121-36. doi: 10.1007/s11948-997-0003-9.