Bolze R S
Health Prog. 1985 Nov;66(9):34-5, 62.
When Charter Medical Corporation applied for a certificate-of-need in the Raleigh, NC, area, Rex Hospital opposed the application on the grounds that medical services could be provided more cost-effectively by following a community health care plan that it had been working on for more than a year with the regional Health Planning Council and another hospital. Rex and the other planners contended that granting the application would result in needless duplication of area health facilities. The application was granted nonetheless, and eventually the case ended up in federal court. Two trials ensued. The second jury decision, which found in favor of Rex Hospital, holds two important implications for health care trustees and administrators. First, a limited but crucial antitrust immunity exists for hospitals that engage in good-faith planning to restrain costs and avoid unnecessary duplication of health care resources. Second, community hospitals can join together in opposing CON applications even if their intent is to eliminate competition; their conduct, however, must not be designed to deny a fair hearing to the other party.
当查特医疗公司在北卡罗来纳州罗利地区申请需求证书时,雷克斯医院反对该申请,理由是通过遵循一项与地区卫生规划委员会及另一家医院共同制定了一年多的社区医疗保健计划,可以更具成本效益地提供医疗服务。雷克斯医院和其他规划者认为,批准该申请将导致该地区卫生设施的不必要重复。尽管如此,该申请还是获得了批准,最终此案进入了联邦法院。随后进行了两次审判。第二次陪审团裁决支持雷克斯医院,这对医疗保健受托人及管理人员有两个重要启示。第一,对于真诚致力于控制成本和避免医疗保健资源不必要重复的医院,存在有限但至关重要的反垄断豁免权。第二,社区医院可以联合起来反对需求证书申请,即使其意图是消除竞争;然而,它们的行为不得旨在剥夺对方的公平听证权。