Vitaliano D F
J Health Econ. 1987 Dec;6(4):305-18. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(87)90018-x.
Data from 166 general hospitals in New York State (1981) is used to estimate a quadratic and logarithmic long-run cost function. Both equations fit the data very well but give very different results. The quadratic appears in confirm the commonly-held view of a shallow U-shaped average cost curve, whereas the log function indicates significant economies of scale: a total and average cost elasticity of 0.9 and -0.10, respectively (using beds or patient days to measure output). Ramsey's RESET test is used to discriminate between the two models and the quadratic is clearly rejected as a misspecification. Scale economies thus exist even where the usual quadratic suggests otherwise.
来自纽约州166家综合医院的数据(1981年)被用于估计一个二次和对数长期成本函数。两个方程对数据的拟合都非常好,但给出的结果却大不相同。二次方程似乎证实了普遍持有的浅U形平均成本曲线的观点,而对数函数则表明存在显著的规模经济:总成本弹性和平均成本弹性分别为0.9和-0.10(使用床位或住院天数来衡量产出)。拉姆齐重置检验被用于区分这两个模型,二次方程明显因设定错误而被拒绝。因此,即使通常的二次方程表明不存在规模经济,实际上规模经济也是存在的。