Ross M B
Hosp Formul. 1989 Aug;24(8):441-4, 447-9.
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 enticed numerous manufacturers to enter the generic drug market. Even though products marketed under this act must be bioequivalent to brand name products and must meet the same FDA standards for quality, reports of inequivalence have appeared in the literature. However, cases of inequivalence and lack of efficacy have also been reported with brand name drugs. Discussed in this article are current data on the use of brand name versus generic products of several problematic drugs and drug classes--thyroid preparations, conjugated estrogens, digoxin, phenothiazines, theophylline, and anticonvulsants. Also included in this article is an explanation of the terms used in discussions of brand name and generic drugs, a review of recent changes in legislation that pertain to the development of brand name and generic drugs, and recommendations of steps to take (in-house and federal) when problems with medications are discovered.
1984年的《药品价格竞争与专利期限恢复法案》吸引了众多制造商进入仿制药市场。尽管根据该法案销售的产品必须与品牌药具有生物等效性,并且必须符合美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)相同的质量标准,但文献中仍出现了不等效的报道。然而,品牌药也有不等效和缺乏疗效的案例报道。本文讨论了几种有问题的药物及其剂型(甲状腺制剂、结合雌激素、地高辛、吩噻嗪类、茶碱和抗惊厥药)使用品牌药与仿制药的当前数据。本文还解释了品牌药和仿制药讨论中使用的术语,回顾了与品牌药和仿制药开发相关的近期立法变化,并给出了发现药物问题时应采取的措施建议(内部措施和联邦措施)。