Cromwell J, Burstein P
Health Care Financ Rev. 1985 Summer;6(4):51-68.
Physicians' claims that extensive Medicare and Medicaid fee discounting imposes an inequitable burden on them are examined using survey data from the Health Care Financing Administration on 5,000 primary care physicians. A definite fee hierarchy is documented, with the physician's usual charge at the top and Medicare and Medicaid allowables at the bottom. Under usual, customary, and reasonable methods, physicians can use fees to maximize payment, and insurer attempts to control fees result in both sides participating in a revenue maximization-expenditure control game. Raising Medicare and Medicaid allowables to the physician's usual fee is shown to result in large windfall gains that are unnecessary and unjustified in terms of work effort, human capital investment, or eliciting an adequate supply of practitioners.
利用医疗保健财务管理局对5000名初级保健医生的调查数据,研究了医生们关于医疗保险和医疗补助大幅降低费用给他们带来不公平负担的说法。记录了明确的费用等级,医生的通常收费处于最高位,医疗保险和医疗补助的允许费用处于最低位。在惯常、习惯和合理的方法下,医生可以利用费用来实现支付最大化,而保险公司控制费用的尝试导致双方参与收益最大化-支出控制博弈。将医疗保险和医疗补助的允许费用提高到医生的通常费用水平,结果显示会带来巨大的意外之财,从工作努力、人力资本投资或吸引足够数量的从业者供应方面来看,这些收益是不必要且不合理的。