Suppr超能文献

新批准药物的安全性:近期的市场撤市意味着存在问题吗?

The safety of newly approved medicines: do recent market removals mean there is a problem?

作者信息

Friedman M A, Woodcock J, Lumpkin M M, Shuren J E, Hass A E, Thompson L J

机构信息

Office of the Commissioner, The US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20857, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1999 May 12;281(18):1728-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.18.1728.

Abstract

The removal of 5 pharmaceuticals from the market in a 12-month period because of unexpected adverse events raised concerns about the adequacy of the drug review process at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Specifically, concerns were raised about improvements in drug review efficiency that significantly reduced FDA review times. We have reviewed the circumstances of the 5 removals to determine whether there was any relationship to the increased efficiencies in the drug review process. When the removed drugs were analyzed by date of approval, no increase in the number of drugs taken off the market was seen, demonstrating that reduced review processing time was not the reason for the cluster of removals. We conclude that the agency's drug review procedures and postmarketing surveillance system after a drug has been marketed are currently adequate but must continually adjust to future challenges.

摘要

在12个月内,有5种药品因意外不良事件被撤出市场,这引发了人们对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)药品审评程序是否充分的担忧。具体而言,人们对大幅缩短FDA审评时间的药品审评效率提升提出了质疑。我们审查了这5种药品被撤市的情况,以确定其与药品审评流程效率提高之间是否存在任何关联。按批准日期对被撤市药品进行分析时,未发现撤市药品数量增加,这表明审评处理时间缩短并非撤市集中出现的原因。我们得出结论,该机构目前的药品审评程序以及药品上市后的监测系统是充分的,但必须不断调整以应对未来的挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验