Suppr超能文献

招募青少年参与烟草定性研究:经验与教训

Recruiting adolescents into qualitative tobacco research studies: experiences and lessons learned.

作者信息

McCormick L K, Crawford M, Anderson R H, Gittelsohn J, Kingsley B, Upson D

机构信息

Dept. of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens 30605, USA.

出版信息

J Sch Health. 1999 Mar;69(3):95-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1999.tb07215.x.

Abstract

An increasing barrier to the development and implementation of effective youth smoking prevention and cessation programs involves recruiting adolescents into research studies. Even for non-intervention studies, issues of consent, confidentiality, and motivation to participate are important considerations. In 1996, 11 Prevention Research Center sites across the country conducted qualitative research using focus groups to explore ethnic differences in smoking among adolescents. The diversity in strategies used to interest, motivate, and retain potential focus group subjects provided a rich data set for information about effective strategies and challenges to recruitment. This article presents an overview of recruitment methods used in a multi-site qualitative study on adolescent tobacco use, reports on successful and less successful strategies, and provides recommendations for future recruitment.

摘要

招募青少年参与研究成为了有效预防和戒烟项目开发与实施过程中日益凸显的障碍。即便对于非干预性研究而言,同意参与、保密以及参与动机等问题也是需要重点考量的。1996年,全国11个预防研究中心通过焦点小组开展了定性研究,以探究青少年吸烟的种族差异。在吸引、激励并留住潜在焦点小组成员的策略方面所呈现出的多样性,为获取有关有效策略及招募挑战的信息提供了丰富的数据集。本文概述了一项关于青少年烟草使用的多地点定性研究中所采用的招募方法,报告了成功及不太成功的策略,并为未来的招募工作提供了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验