Jondeau G, Boutouyrie P, Lacolley P, Laloux B, Dubourg O, Bourdarias J P, Laurent S
Service de Cardiologie and Consultation Marfan, Ambroise Paré, Boulogne, France.
Circulation. 1999 May 25;99(20):2677-81. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.20.2677.
In patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS), brachial pulse pressure (PP) has been recognized as a risk factor for aortic dilatation, leading to aortic dissection, the main cause of premature death. However, the relationships between aortic PP, aortic stiffness, and aortic root dilation have not been investigated. Our main objective was to determine whether central PP, which takes into account wave reflections and aortic stiffness, is a better determinant of ascending aorta diameter than brachial PP in MFS patients.
Twenty patients with confirmed MFS and 20 age- and sex-matched control subjects were included in this cross-sectional, noninvasive study. Elastic properties of the abdominal aorta and common carotid, common femoral, and radial arteries were calculated from the pulsatile changes in arterial diameter and pressure. The ascending aorta diameter, measured with conventional echocardiography, was 37% larger in MFS than in control subjects (P<0.001). Arterial distensibility was 38% lower in MFS than in control subjects at the site of the abdominal aorta (P<0.01) but not at other sites (common carotid, common femoral, and radial arteries). Independently of age and body surface area, ascending aorta diameter was positively correlated with carotid PP in MFS (P<0. 01) and negatively in control subjects (P<0.01) but was not correlated with brachial PP and mean blood pressure.
In patients with MFS, local PP, estimated from carotid PP, was a major determinant of ascending aorta diameter, whereas brachial PP was not. Increased arterial stiffness was confined to the aorta.
在马凡综合征(MFS)患者中,肱动脉脉压(PP)已被确认为主动脉扩张的危险因素,可导致主动脉夹层形成,这是过早死亡的主要原因。然而,主动脉PP、主动脉僵硬度和主动脉根部扩张之间的关系尚未得到研究。我们的主要目的是确定在MFS患者中,考虑到波反射和主动脉僵硬度的中心PP是否比肱动脉PP更能决定升主动脉直径。
本横断面、非侵入性研究纳入了20例确诊为MFS的患者以及20例年龄和性别匹配的对照受试者。根据动脉直径和压力的搏动变化计算腹主动脉、颈总动脉、股总动脉和桡动脉的弹性特性。用传统超声心动图测量的升主动脉直径,MFS患者比对照受试者大37%(P<0.001)。在腹主动脉部位,MFS患者的动脉扩张性比对照受试者低38%(P<0.01),但在其他部位(颈总动脉、股总动脉和桡动脉)则无差异。独立于年龄和体表面积,MFS患者的升主动脉直径与颈动脉PP呈正相关(P<0.01),对照受试者则呈负相关(P<0.01),但与肱动脉PP和平均血压无关。
在MFS患者中,由颈动脉PP估算的局部PP是升主动脉直径的主要决定因素,而肱动脉PP则不是。动脉僵硬度增加仅限于主动脉。