Gong Q Y, Tan L T, Romaniuk C S, Jones B, Brunt J N, Roberts N
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Wirral, Merseyside, UK.
Br J Radiol. 1999 Jan;72(853):62-72. doi: 10.1259/bjr.72.853.10341691.
Tumour regression rates of 11 patients with cervical carcinoma were estimated during external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) using serial MRI (average time interval 7 days; range 3-15 days). An average of five investigations (range 4-8) was performed per subject. Tumour volume was measured by two observers using the Cavalieri method of modern design stereology in combination with (a) planimetry and (b) point counting. The mean precision of all the volume estimates obtained by manually tracing the outline of the tumour was 6.6%. The mean precision obtained by counting an average of 176 points per investigation on the same transects was 6.7%. The intraobserver repeatability of planimetry, interobserver reproducibility of planimetry and point counting were excellent with no significant difference between the volume estimates obtained using either technique. Based on the planimetry measurements, initial tumour volumes ranged from 6.5 to 222 cm3 (mean 63 cm3, median 44 cm3). Based on the point counting measurements, initial tumour volumes ranged from 7.2 to 235 cm3 (mean 68 cm3, median 46 cm3). Tumour regression began within a few days of commencing EBRT and showed an exponential relationship with time (p < 0.01). There was good agreement between the regression rates obtained by planimetry and those obtained by point counting. No significant correlation was found between initial tumour volume and tumour regression rate for either planimetry or point counting. Planimetry measurements were, on average, obtained in about half the time taken for point counting (i.e. 30 min and 50 min, respectively). Although point counting is generally likely to be the more efficient approach, planimetry may be the preferred approach for estimating tumour volume when a purpose built track ball is available and the tumour morphology is relatively simple. Volume measurement should be obtained using the Cavalieri method to ensure that the estimates are unbiased and that their precision can be predicted. The measured tumour regression rates may have important implications for improving local tumour control, optimum timing of brachytherapy and minimizing the risk of radiation damage.
在体外放射治疗(EBRT)期间,使用系列磁共振成像(MRI)(平均时间间隔7天;范围3 - 15天)评估了11例宫颈癌患者的肿瘤退缩率。每位受试者平均进行了5次检查(范围4 - 8次)。两名观察者使用现代设计体视学的卡瓦列里方法,结合(a)面积测量法和(b)点计数法测量肿瘤体积。通过手动描绘肿瘤轮廓获得的所有体积估计值的平均精度为6.6%。通过在相同横截面上每次检查平均计数176个点获得的平均精度为6.7%。面积测量法的观察者内重复性、面积测量法和点计数法的观察者间再现性都非常好,使用这两种技术获得的体积估计值之间没有显著差异。基于面积测量法,初始肿瘤体积范围为6.5至222 cm³(平均63 cm³,中位数44 cm³)。基于点计数法,初始肿瘤体积范围为7.2至235 cm³(平均68 cm³,中位数46 cm³)。肿瘤退缩在开始EBRT后的几天内开始,并与时间呈指数关系(p < 0.01)。面积测量法和点计数法获得的退缩率之间有良好的一致性。对于面积测量法或点计数法,初始肿瘤体积与肿瘤退缩率之间均未发现显著相关性。面积测量法平均所需时间约为点计数法的一半(即分别为30分钟和50分钟)。虽然一般来说点计数法可能是更有效的方法,但当有专用轨迹球且肿瘤形态相对简单时,面积测量法可能是估计肿瘤体积的首选方法。应使用卡瓦列里方法进行体积测量,以确保估计值无偏差且其精度可预测。测量得到的肿瘤退缩率可能对改善局部肿瘤控制、近距离放射治疗的最佳时机以及将辐射损伤风险降至最低具有重要意义。