Wiebe E R
Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00146-2.
This was a dual-cohort study performed to determine if, by using methotrexate alone, abortions could be induced with fewer side effects, without sacrificing effectiveness and patient satisfaction. The subjects were 358 consecutive patients who requested elective medical termination of pregnancy at < 7 weeks gestation. Women were given information and allowed to choose between methotrexate alone (50 mg/m2 intramuscularly) or methotrexate followed 4 days later by 800 micrograms misoprostol vaginally. The two groups were compared with respect to the number of surgical aspirations required, the number of days until the abortion was completed, side effects, and the number of women who would choose the same method again. The surgery rate for methotrexate was 17.2%, whereas for the combination it was 10.9%. The mean numbers of days until the abortion were complete was 23 and 12, respectively. Side effects, mean pain scores, total days of bleeding, and satisfaction rates were not significantly different in the two groups. The high failure rate with methotreaxate alone suggests that it should not be offered despite the high level of satisfaction.
这是一项双队列研究,旨在确定仅使用甲氨蝶呤能否在不牺牲有效性和患者满意度的情况下,诱导流产且副作用更少。研究对象为358例连续要求在妊娠小于7周时进行选择性药物流产的患者。向这些女性提供相关信息,让她们在仅使用甲氨蝶呤(50mg/m²肌肉注射)或甲氨蝶呤治疗4天后再阴道给予800微克米索前列醇这两种方式之间进行选择。比较两组患者所需的手术清宫次数、流产完成所需天数、副作用以及会再次选择相同方法的女性人数。仅用甲氨蝶呤组的手术率为17.2%,而联合用药组为10.9%。流产完成的平均天数分别为23天和12天。两组的副作用、平均疼痛评分、总出血天数和满意率无显著差异。仅使用甲氨蝶呤的高失败率表明,尽管满意度较高,但不应采用该方法。