Farragos A F, Schemitsch E H, McKee M D
Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Orthop Trauma. 1999 May;13(4):258-67. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199905000-00006.
The purpose of the present review is to document the complications associated with the use of locking humeral nails and to discuss the prevention and management of these complications.
Clinical and research experience supported by a Medline review of the English-language literature from 1985 to 1998.
The majority of (clinical) information available was contained in retrospective reviews; only three prospective or randomized studies were identified (all in abstract form). Anatomical research regarding locking humeral nailing was also identified and included.
Because there were so few prospective studies available, a formal meta-analysis of data was not performed. This review focuses on a descriptive assessment of available information on specific complication-related topics.
The attractive theoretical advantages of locking humeral nails have not been borne out in clinical studies. Complications such as shoulder pain, delayed union or nonunion, fracture about the implant, iatrogenic fracture comminution, and the difficulty in the reconstruction of failures have diminished their usefulness. The precise role of locking nails in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures has yet to be defined. At present, open reduction and compression plating remain the treatment of choice for humeral shaft fractures that require operative intervention.
本综述的目的是记录与使用锁定肱骨钉相关的并发症,并讨论这些并发症的预防和处理。
1985年至1998年对英文文献进行Medline检索所支持的临床和研究经验。
大多数现有(临床)信息包含在回顾性综述中;仅识别出三项前瞻性或随机研究(均为摘要形式)。还识别并纳入了关于锁定肱骨钉固定的解剖学研究。
由于可用的前瞻性研究很少,因此未对数据进行正式的荟萃分析。本综述重点在于对特定并发症相关主题的现有信息进行描述性评估。
锁定肱骨钉在理论上具有吸引力的优势在临床研究中并未得到证实。诸如肩部疼痛、延迟愈合或不愈合、植入物周围骨折、医源性骨折粉碎以及失败重建的困难等并发症已降低了其效用。锁定钉在肱骨干骨折治疗中的确切作用尚未明确。目前,切开复位加压钢板仍是需要手术干预的肱骨干骨折的首选治疗方法。