顺势疗法再探：一项有问题的荟萃分析。
Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
出版信息
Prescrire Int. 1998 Jun;7(35):94-5.
PMID:10342930
Abstract
A meta-analysis published in the Lancet in September 1997 cautiously concluded that homeopathic drug activity is not fully explained by the placebo effect. A thorough examination of this meta-analysis reveals design errors that make the results untrustworthy. There is still nothing to suggest that homeopathic drugs are any more effective than a placebo.
摘要
1997年9月发表在《柳叶刀》上的一项荟萃分析谨慎地得出结论，顺势疗法药物的活性不能完全用安慰剂效应来解释。对这项荟萃分析的全面审查发现了设计错误，这使得结果不可信。仍然没有任何证据表明顺势疗法药物比安慰剂更有效。
相似文献
1
Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
Prescrire Int. 1998 Jun;7(35):94-5.
2
Homeopathic arnica: just a placebo.
Prescrire Int. 2001 Oct;10(55):156.
3
Reinventing the wheel will not make it rounder: controlled trials of homeopathy reconsidered.
J Altern Complement Med. 2003 Feb;9(1):7-13. doi: 10.1089/107555303321222865.
4
Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
CMAJ. 1999 Apr 20;160(8):1128-9.
5
Open letter in response to the article in the Lancet.
Explore (NY). 2006 Jan;2(1):7. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2005.12.001.
6
Homeopathic research after the Lancet meta analysis--a moment for introspection.
Complement Ther Med. 2005 Dec;13(4):303-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2005.10.006. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
7
Understanding placebo effects in homeopathic clinical trials.
J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):784. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.784.
8
[Homeopathy--only a placebo?].
Lakartidningen. 2000 Dec 6;97(49):5754.
9
Unsubstantiated claims of large effects of placebo on pain: serious errors in meta-analysis of placebo analgesia mechanism studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;59(4):336-8; discussion 339-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.05.011.
10
Reinventing the wheel? Or the emperor's new clothes.
J Altern Complement Med. 2003 Oct;9(5):613-5. doi: 10.1089/107555303322524445.
Zotero 插件