Institutional analysis and physicians' rights after Vacco v. Quill.

作者信息

Palmer L I

机构信息

Cornell Law School, USA.

出版信息

Cornell J Law Public Policy. 1998 Winter;7(2):415-30.

PMID:10342956

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Institutional analysis and physicians' rights after Vacco v. Quill.

Cornell J Law Public Policy. 1998 Winter;7(2):415-30.

The Supreme Court speaks--not assisted suicide but a constitutional right to palliative care.

N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 23;337(17):1234-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710233371712.

Oral arguments in Vacco v. Quill. No. 95-1858.

Issues Law Med. 1997 Spring;12(4):417-39.

A proposal to recognize a legal obligation on physicians to provide adequate medication to alleviate pain.

J Law Health. 1997;12(2):381-405.

Options at the end of life.

J Leg Med. 1993 Mar;14(1):139-51. doi: 10.1080/01947649309510907.

Planned assisted suicide.

Nurs Ethics. 2011 Nov;18(6):753-5. doi: 10.1177/0969733011424337.

Brief of the Attorney General in Vacco v. Quill in the United States Supreme Court. No. 95-1858.

Issues Law Med. 1996 Winter;12(3):275-94.

Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill prohibitions on assisted suicide do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

J Contemp Law. 1998;24(1):167-77.

The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death.

Buffalo Law Rev. 2000 Winter;48(1):83-173.

Legal aspects of withholding and withdrawing life support from critically ill patients in the United States and providing palliative care to them.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec;162(6):2029-32. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.6.1-00.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验