Rhee G J, Woo J S, Hwang S J, Lee Y W, Lee C H
College of Pharmacy, Chung-nam National University, Taejon, Korea.
Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999 Jun;25(6):717-26. doi: 10.1081/ddc-100102231.
In an attempt to improve the skin penetration of ketoprofen, various transdermal formulations were prepared, and their in vitro skin permeability and in vivo percutaneous absorption were evaluated. In vitro permeation studies were performed using a modified Franz cell diffusion system in which permeation parameters such as cumulative amount at 8 hr Q8hr, steady-state flux Jss, or lag time tL were determined. In the in vivo percutaneous absorption study using the hairless mouse, maximum concentration Cmax and area under the curve at 24 hr AUC24h were measured. The optimal transdermal formulation (oleo-hydrogel formulation) of ketoprofen showed a Q8hr value of 227.20 micrograms/cm2, a Jss value of 29.61 micrograms/cm2/hr, and a tL value of 0.46 hr. The Q8hr and Jss values were about 10-fold (p < .01) higher than those (Q8hr = 19.61 micrograms/cm2; Jss = 2.66 micrograms/cm2/hr) from the K-gel and about 3.5-fold (p < .01) than those (Q8hr = 60.00 micrograms/cm2; Jss = 7.99 micrograms/cm2/hr) of the K-plaster. In the in vivo percutaneous absorption, the Cmax (6.82 micrograms/ml) and AUC24h (55.74 micrograms.hr/ml) values of the optimal formulation were significantly (p < .01) higher than those of K-gel and K-plaster. The relative bioavailability of the oleo-hydrogel following transdermal administration in reference to oral administration was about 37%, and the Cmax value (4.73 micrograms/cm2) in the hypodermis following topical administration was much higher than those from the conventional products (Cmax of K-gel and K-plaster were 0.92 +/- 0.19 microgram/cm2 and 1.27 +/- 0.37 microgram/cm2, respectively). These data demonstrate that the oleo-hydrogel formulation of ketoprofen was more beneficial than conventional products (K-gel and K-plaster) in enhancing transdermal permeation and skin absorption of ketoprofen. Furthermore, there was a good correlation between in vitro permeation parameters and in vivo percutaneous absorption parameters.
为提高酮洛芬的皮肤渗透性,制备了多种透皮制剂,并对其体外皮肤渗透性和体内经皮吸收情况进行了评估。体外渗透研究采用改良的Franz细胞扩散系统进行,测定了8小时累积量Q8hr、稳态通量Jss或滞后时间tL等渗透参数。在使用无毛小鼠的体内经皮吸收研究中,测量了最大浓度Cmax和24小时曲线下面积AUC24h。酮洛芬的最佳透皮制剂(油基水凝胶制剂)的Q8hr值为227.20微克/平方厘米,Jss值为29.61微克/平方厘米/小时,tL值为0.46小时。Q8hr和Jss值比K凝胶的相应值(Q8hr = 19.61微克/平方厘米;Jss = 2.66微克/平方厘米/小时)高约10倍(p < 0.01),比K贴剂的相应值(Q8hr = 60.00微克/平方厘米;Jss = 7.99微克/平方厘米/小时)高约3.5倍(p < 0.01)。在体内经皮吸收方面,最佳制剂的Cmax(6.82微克/毫升)和AUC24h(55.74微克·小时/毫升)值显著高于K凝胶和K贴剂(p < 0.01)。透皮给药后油基水凝胶相对于口服给药的相对生物利用度约为37%,局部给药后皮下组织中的Cmax值(4.73微克/平方厘米)远高于传统产品(K凝胶和K贴剂的Cmax分别为0.92±0.19微克/平方厘米和1.27±0.37微克/平方厘米)。这些数据表明,酮洛芬的油基水凝胶制剂在增强酮洛芬的透皮渗透和皮肤吸收方面比传统产品(K凝胶和K贴剂)更具优势。此外,体外渗透参数与体内经皮吸收参数之间存在良好的相关性。