Glynn J J, Perkins D
Business School, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
J Manag Med. 1998;12(4-5):256-69, 196-7. doi: 10.1108/02689239810248017.
Before the imposition of the NHS internal market, systems of accountability and control were far from adequate and could be criticized on a number of grounds. The market was offered as a panacea to address these inadequacies. However, in practice there have only been partial improvements which could have been achieved without the imposition of the market. The market also creates new problems and a number of crises and scandals seem to be addressed at the political level by pleas to utilize resources more effectively. These pleas mean that more and more the focus is turning back to central planning in the provision of care and further away from so-called market mechanisms. The NHS "managed" market has been imperfect and will continue to be so. Argues that there is no alternative but to return to the planned provision of health care in order to improve on accountability and control in the NHS. Hopefully the adverse impact of the market on clinicians and others will force a more rational reappraisal of the fundamental raison d'être of the NHS and the need for those involved in the delivery of services, at all levels, to be more openly accountable.
在国民医疗服务体系(NHS)内部市场实施之前,问责和控制体系远不完善,且在诸多方面饱受诟病。市场被视作解决这些不足的万灵药。然而,实际上仅取得了部分改善,即便不推行市场机制也本可实现这些改善。市场还引发了新问题,一些危机和丑闻似乎在政治层面通过呼吁更有效地利用资源来应对。这些呼吁意味着,在医疗服务提供方面,越来越多的焦点正重新转向中央规划,而愈发远离所谓的市场机制。NHS的“管理型”市场并不完美,且将持续如此。有人认为,别无他法,只能回归计划性的医疗保健提供方式,以改善NHS的问责和控制。但愿市场对临床医生及其他人员的不利影响将促使对NHS的基本存在理由以及各级服务提供者更公开问责的必要性进行更合理的重新评估。