Weber D O
Physician Exec. 1998 Nov-Dec;24(6):6-14.
Therapies variously described as alternative, complementary, or unconventional because they lie outside the realm of scientific medicine practiced by graduates of orthodox U.S. medical schools are gaining mainstream respectability despite many questions about their efficacy and safety. Depending on definitions, surveys indicate that fewer than 10 percent to nearly 40 percent of Americans supplement or substitute for conventional health care with alternative systems of medical practice. Spending for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) nationwide has been estimated at up to $14 billion a year. Establishment of an Office of Alternative Medicine in the National Institutes of Health in 1992 has heartened advocates of CAM, increased interest and government funding for research into unorthodox therapies, and lent credibility to CAM modalities. Embracing marginal therapies may represent an opportunity for physicians and health systems to reduce inappropriate consumption, offer a wider range of choices to patients, and profit from a lucrative market.
一些疗法因不属于美国正统医学院校毕业生所从事的科学医学范畴,而被分别描述为替代疗法、补充疗法或非传统疗法。尽管这些疗法在疗效和安全性方面存在诸多疑问,但它们正逐渐获得主流认可。根据不同的定义,调查显示,用替代医疗体系补充或替代传统医疗保健的美国人比例,少则不到10%,多则近40%。据估计,全国每年在补充和替代医学(CAM)上的花费高达140亿美元。1992年美国国立卫生研究院设立替代医学办公室,这让补充和替代医学的倡导者备受鼓舞,增加了对非传统疗法研究的兴趣和政府资金投入,也为补充和替代医学模式增添了可信度。接纳边缘疗法可能为医生和医疗系统提供了一个契机,来减少不当消费,为患者提供更多选择,并从利润丰厚的市场中获利。