Suppr超能文献

房间隔起搏:预防复发性心房颤动的一种新方法。

Interatrial septum pacing: a new approach to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Padeletti L, Porciani M C, Michelucci A, Colella A, Ticci P, Vena S, Costoli A, Ciapetti C, Pieragnoli P, Gensini G F

机构信息

Institute of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University of Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Mar;3(1):35-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1009867305678.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are a variety of approaches to the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) with pacing. Aim of this study was to test the safety and feasibility of interatrial septum pacing at the posterior triangle of Koch for AF prevention and to exclude potential arrhythmic effects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Interatrial septum pacing was performed in 34 patients (21 males, 13 females, mean age 69 +/- 12 years): 9 without a history and clinical evidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) (6 with sinus bradycardia, 2 with second-degree AV block, and 1 with carotid sinus hypersensitivity) and 25 with sinus bradycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (mean symptomatic episodes/month 6.2 +/- 10). In all patients a screw-in bipolar lead was positioned in the interatrial septum superiorly to the coronary sinus.

RESULTS

At implant the mean P wave amplitude was 2.5 +/- 1.5 mV, the pacing threshold was 1 +/- 0.6 V and the impedance was 907 +/- 477 Ohm. Mean P wave duration was 118 +/- 17 ms in sinus rhythm and 82 +/- 15 during interatrial septum pacing (p < 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 10 +/- 7 months, no patients without atrial tachyarrhythmias before implantation experienced AF. During a 9 +/- 6 months follow-up we observed only 2 symptomatic arrhythmia recurrences between AF patients (mean symptomatic episodes/month 0.006 +/- 0.0022) (p < 0.01 vs before implant period).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that interatrial septal pacing is safe and feasible. A significant less incidence of arrhythmic episodes has been observed during follow-up. Further controlled randomized prospective studies are necessary to establish the exact role of this technique respect to conventional or multisite stimulation when patients with paroxysmal AF need to be permanently paced.

摘要

背景

有多种通过起搏预防心房颤动(AF)的方法。本研究的目的是测试在Koch三角后部进行房间隔起搏预防AF的安全性和可行性,并排除潜在的心律失常影响。

材料与方法

对34例患者(21例男性,13例女性,平均年龄69±12岁)进行房间隔起搏:9例无房颤病史及临床证据(6例窦性心动过缓,2例二度房室传导阻滞,1例颈动脉窦过敏),25例窦性心动过缓和阵发性房颤(PAF)(平均每月症状发作6.2±10次)。所有患者均将螺旋式双极电极置于冠状窦上方的房间隔。

结果

植入时平均P波振幅为2.5±1.5mV,起搏阈值为1±0.6V,阻抗为907±477欧姆。窦性心律时平均P波时限为118±17ms,房间隔起搏时为82±15ms(p<0.001)。在平均10±7个月的随访期内,植入前无房性快速心律失常的患者未发生AF。在9±6个月的随访中,我们仅观察到AF患者中有2次症状性心律失常复发(平均每月症状发作0.006±0.0022次)(与植入前期相比p<0.01)。

结论

我们的数据表明房间隔起搏是安全可行的。随访期间观察到心律失常发作的发生率显著降低。当阵发性AF患者需要永久起搏时,需要进一步的对照随机前瞻性研究来确定该技术相对于传统或多部位刺激的确切作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验