Lucas F, Sclafani A
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College and the Graduate School, The City University of New York, 11210-2889, USA.
Physiol Behav. 1999 May;66(3):389-95. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00274-1.
Intragastric (i.g.) infusions of fat and carbohydrate condition flavor preferences in rats, but different results have been obtained in studies using pure and mixed nutrient infusions. This experiment compared the preference conditioning effects of mixed high-carbohydrate (HC) and high-fat (HF) diet infusions during short-term and long-term sessions. In Experiment 1 food-deprived rats were given one flavored saccharin solution (CS+HC) paired with i.g. infusions of an HC liquid diet, a second flavor (CS+HF) paired with HF diet infusions, and a third flavor (CS-) paired with i.g. water infusions during 30-min one-bottle training sessions. In subsequent two-bottle tests (30 min/day), the rats preferred both CS+s to the CS- and preferred the CS+HC to the CS+HF. In Experiment 2, the same rats were trained and tested with the CSs and paired infusions during 22 h/day sessions with chow available ad lib. Both CS+s were again preferred to the CS-, but now the CS+HF was preferred to the CS+HC. When given additional 30-min choice sessions in Experiment 3 the rats showed no reliable preference for the CS+HC versus CS+HF under food-deprived or ad lib conditions. In Experiment 4, the rats were given 22-h CS+HC versus CS+HF choice sessions every other day. They showed no reliable CS preference during the first 30 min of each session, but reliably preferred the CS+HF during the remaining 21.5 h. These findings indicate that previously reported differences in preferences conditioned by pure versus mixed nutrient infusions are due to training procedures (session length, deprivation state) rather than to the type of nutrient infusions per se. The rats displayed different CS+HF versus CS+HC preferences as a function of test duration even after being given both short- and long-term training. Thus, short-term choice tests do not always predict the long-term intakes and preferences for high-fat and high-carbohydrate foods.
向大鼠胃内(i.g.)输注脂肪和碳水化合物可调节其对味道的偏好,但在使用纯营养素输注和混合营养素输注的研究中得到了不同的结果。本实验比较了短期和长期实验中混合高碳水化合物(HC)和高脂肪(HF)饮食输注的偏好调节效果。在实验1中,将食物剥夺的大鼠在30分钟的单瓶训练期间给予一种加味糖精溶液(CS + HC),与HC液体饮食的胃内输注配对,第二种味道(CS + HF)与HF饮食输注配对,第三种味道(CS -)与胃内输注水配对。在随后的两瓶测试(每天30分钟)中,大鼠对两种CS +均比CS -更偏好,且对CS + HC比CS + HF更偏好。在实验2中,相同的大鼠在每天22小时的实验中进行训练和测试,同时自由提供食物。两种CS +再次比CS -更受偏好,但现在CS + HF比CS + HC更受偏好。在实验3中,当给予额外的30分钟选择实验时,大鼠在食物剥夺或自由进食条件下对CS + HC与CS + HF没有可靠的偏好。在实验4中,大鼠每隔一天进行22小时的CS + HC与CS + HF选择实验。它们在每个实验的前30分钟内没有可靠的CS偏好,但在其余的21.5小时内可靠地偏好CS + HF。这些发现表明,先前报道的纯营养素输注与混合营养素输注所调节的偏好差异是由于训练程序(实验时长、剥夺状态)而非营养素输注本身的类型。即使经过短期和长期训练,大鼠对CS + HF与CS + HC的偏好也会因测试时长而有所不同。因此,短期选择测试并不总是能预测对高脂肪和高碳水化合物食物的长期摄入量和偏好。