Lee K, Bussey K
Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Jul;73(3):161-82. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2501.
Similar experimental procedures are used in misinformation studies and in retroactive inhibition studies. Despite these similarities, the findings of these studies have suggested that misleading postevent information and inconsistent postevent information would have different effects on children's recollections. To examine this hypothesis, 28 seven-year-olds learned a target game to criterion. Two days later, they were administered either type of postevent information on either one or three occasions. When the children were tested 3 weeks later, the results showed that even criterion-learned information could be affected detrimentally by exposure to misleading or inconsistent postevent information. Notably, children who were administered misinformation on one occasion reported more target information than children in all other groups. It is suggested that exposure to misinformation had a facilitative effect on these children's recollections.
在错误信息研究和倒摄抑制研究中使用了类似的实验程序。尽管存在这些相似之处,但这些研究的结果表明,误导性的事后信息和不一致的事后信息对儿童的记忆会产生不同的影响。为了检验这一假设,28名七岁儿童学习一个目标游戏直至达到标准。两天后,他们在一次或三次的情况下被给予任何一种事后信息。当这些儿童在三周后接受测试时,结果表明,即使是达到标准学习的信息也可能受到接触误导性或不一致的事后信息的不利影响。值得注意的是,只接受过一次错误信息的儿童比其他所有组的儿童报告了更多的目标信息。有人认为,接触错误信息对这些儿童的记忆有促进作用。