Kuratani S, Horigome N, Hirano S
Department of Biology, Okayama University, Faculty of Science, Okayama, Japan.
Dev Biol. 1999 Jun 15;210(2):381-400. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9266.
Due to the peculiar morphology of its preotic head, lampreys have long been treated as an intermediate animal which links amphioxus and gnathostomes. To reevaluate the segmental theory of classical comparative embryology, mesodermal development was observed in embryos of a lamprey, Lampetra japonica, by scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Signs of segmentation are visible in future postotic somites at an early neurula stage, whereas the rostral mesoderm is unsegmented and rostromedially confluent with the prechordal plate. The premandibular and mandibular mesoderm develop from the prechordal plate in a caudal to rostral direction and can be called the preaxial mesoderm as opposed to the caudally developing gastral mesoderm. With the exception of the premandibular mesoderm, the head mesodermal sheet is secondarily regionalized by the otocyst and pharyngeal pouches into the mandibular mesoderm, hyoid mesoderm, and somite 0. The head mesodermal components never develop into cephalic myotomes, but the latter develop only from postotic somites. These results show that the lamprey embryo shows a typical vertebrate phylotype and that the basic mesodermal configuration of vertebrates already existed prior to the split of agnatha-gnathostomata; lamprey does not represent an intermediate state between amphioxus and gnathostomes. Unlike interpretations of theories of head segmentation that the mesodermal segments are primarily equivalent along the axis, there is no evidence in vertebrate embryos for the presence of preotic myotomes. We conclude that mesomere-based theories of head metamerism are inappropriate and that the formulated vertebrate head should possess the distinction between primarily unsegmented head mesoderm which includes preaxial components at least in part and somites in the trunk which are shared in all the known vertebrate embryos as the vertebrate phylotype.
由于七鳃鳗耳前头部的特殊形态,长期以来它们一直被视为连接文昌鱼和有颌类动物的中间动物。为了重新评估经典比较胚胎学的体节理论,通过扫描电子显微镜和免疫组织化学观察了日本七鳃鳗胚胎中的中胚层发育。在神经胚早期,未来耳后体节中可见体节化迹象,而吻端中胚层未分节,在吻端内侧与脊索前板融合。下颌前和下颌中胚层从脊索前板向尾端至吻端方向发育,与向尾端发育的体壁中胚层相对,可称为轴前中胚层。除下颌前中胚层外,头部中胚层片通过听泡和咽囊继发性地分化为下颌中胚层、舌中胚层和体节0。头部中胚层成分从不发育成头部肌节,而后者仅从耳后体节发育而来。这些结果表明,七鳃鳗胚胎显示出典型的脊椎动物系统型,并且脊椎动物的基本中胚层构型在无颌类-有颌类分歧之前就已经存在;七鳃鳗并不代表文昌鱼和有颌类动物之间的中间状态。与关于头部体节化理论的解释不同,即中胚层体节在轴向上基本等同,在脊椎动物胚胎中没有证据表明存在耳前肌节。我们得出结论,基于中节的头部分节理论是不合适的,并且所形成的脊椎动物头部应该具有主要未分节的头部中胚层(至少部分包括轴前成分)和躯干中的体节之间的区别,这在所有已知的脊椎动物胚胎中作为脊椎动物系统型是共有的。