Suppr超能文献

[颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘中静脉高压的血管造影征象及颅内高压的临床征象的演变]

[Evolution of angiographic signs of venous hypertension and clinical signs of intracranial hypertension in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas].

作者信息

Biondi A, Casasco A, Houdart E, Gioino C, Sourour N, Vivas E, Dormont D, Marsault C

机构信息

Service de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Térapeutique H. Fischgold, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris.

出版信息

J Neuroradiol. 1999 Mar;26(1):49-58.

Abstract

Dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) can cause cerebral venous hypertension (VHT). The most common mechanism is due to the fact that some dAVFs can drain retrogradelly in cortical (better defined as leptomeningeal) veins (directly or after drainage in a dural sinus) causing venous engorgement and consequently an impairment of the cerebral venous drainage. However, more rarely, dAVFs without a cortical venous drainage can also be responsible for VHT probably due to dAVF shunts causing insufficient antegrade cerebral venous drainage. In addition, dAVFs are often associated with stenosis and/or thrombosis of dural sinus(es) which can worsen the VHT. Raised pressure within the superior sagittal sinus causes impeded cerebrospinal reabsorption in the arachnoid villi allowing increased intracranial pressure. The venous engorgement in the cortical veins can cause a venous congestive encephalopathy analogous to the venous congestive myelopathy of the spinal dural AVFs. Clinically VHT can cause not only symptoms related to increased intracranial pressure but also seizures, neurological deficits, impairment of the cognitive functions and dementia. An important aspect is the risk of hemorrhage in dAVFs with a leptomeningeal venous drainage leading to VHT. Although the term VHT sensu strictu should be used if venous pressure measurements are performed, angiographic criteria for VHT such as delayed circulation time, venous engorgement and abnormal visualization of the cerebral veins are well established. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the angiographic signs of VHT in patients with dAVF and to study the course of the VHT and of the clinical signs of increased intracranial pressure before and after dAVF endovascular treatment. A retrospective chart analysis of 22 patients (13 males, 9 females) ranging in age from 20 to 87 years (mean: 53 ys.) with a dAVF associated with angiographic signs of VHT was performed. Ten dAVFs were located on the transverse/sigmoid sinus(es), 6 on the superior sagittal sinus, 3 on the petro-tentorial incisura, 1 on the inferior petrosal sinus, 1 on the anterior ethmoidal region and 1 on the Galen vein region. All dAVFs had a retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage. Stenosis or thrombosis of the dural AVF sinus was observed in 17 cases and stenosis or thrombosis of another sinus(es) and/or of the jugular vein in 8 cases. In 11 patients, the angiographic signs of VHT were global affecting the entire cerebral venous drainage and, in the other 11 patients, the VHT was focal. The VHT caused clinical symptoms of increased intracranial pressure in 18 patients. Other clinical findings included: bruit (11 cases), seizures (3 cases), vertigo (3 cases), visual deficits (2 cases) and impairment of cognitive functions (4 cases). Three patients presented hemorrhage (one parenchymal hematoma, one hemorrhagic infarction and one subarachnoid hemorrhage). The 4 patients without clinical symptoms of increased intracranial pressure presented only bruit in 2 cases, bruit and vertigo in 1 case, bruit and hemorrhagic infarction in another one. The dAVFs were treated by endovascular therapy (arterial approach: 3 cases, venous approach: 6 cases and both arterial and venous approach: 13 cases). Endovascular sessions ranged from 1 to 7 (mean: 2.8) for each patient. After the endovascular treatment, in 12 patients with complete occlusion of the dAVF, the disappearance of angiographic signs of VHT and clinical cure were observed. In 8 patients with partial occlusion of the dAVF, the disappearance of angiographic signs of VHT and clinical cure were observed in 4 cases (almost complete dAVF occlusion in 2 cases); in the other 4 cases, only reduction the angiographic signs of VHT and clinical improvement were obtained. In all 16 patients who were clinically cured angiographic signs of VHT disappeared despite the persistence of dAVF shunts as observed in 4 cases. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

硬脑膜动静脉瘘(dAVF)可导致脑静脉高压(VHT)。最常见的机制是,一些dAVF可逆行引流至皮质(更确切地说是软脑膜)静脉(直接引流或经硬脑膜窦引流后),导致静脉充血,进而损害脑静脉引流。然而,更罕见的是,没有皮质静脉引流的dAVF也可能导致VHT,可能是由于dAVF分流导致顺行性脑静脉引流不足。此外,dAVF常与硬脑膜窦狭窄和/或血栓形成相关,这会加重VHT。上矢状窦内压力升高会阻碍蛛网膜绒毛对脑脊液的重吸收,从而使颅内压升高。皮质静脉的静脉充血可导致类似于脊髓硬脑膜动静脉瘘的静脉充血性脊髓病的静脉充血性脑病。临床上,VHT不仅可引起与颅内压升高相关的症状,还可导致癫痫发作、神经功能缺损、认知功能障碍和痴呆。一个重要方面是伴有软脑膜静脉引流导致VHT的dAVF出血风险。尽管严格意义上的VHT一词应在进行静脉压力测量时使用,但诸如循环时间延迟、静脉充血和脑静脉异常显影等VHT的血管造影标准已得到充分确立。我们研究的目的是评估dAVF患者VHT的血管造影征象,并研究VHT的病程以及dAVF血管内治疗前后颅内压升高的临床体征。对22例(13例男性,9例女性)年龄在20至87岁(平均53岁)、伴有VHT血管造影征象的dAVF患者进行了回顾性病历分析。10个dAVF位于横窦/乙状窦,6个位于上矢状窦,3个位于岩骨-天幕切迹,1个位于岩下窦,1个位于筛前区域,1个位于大脑大静脉区域。所有dAVF均有逆行性软脑膜静脉引流。观察到17例硬脑膜动静脉瘘窦狭窄或血栓形成,8例其他窦和/或颈静脉狭窄或血栓形成。11例患者VHT的血管造影征象为全身性,影响整个脑静脉引流,另外11例患者的VHT为局灶性。VHT导致18例患者出现颅内压升高的临床症状。其他临床发现包括:血管杂音(11例)、癫痫发作(3例)、眩晕(3例)、视力缺损(2例)和认知功能障碍(4例)。3例患者出现出血(1例脑实质血肿、1例出血性梗死和1例蛛网膜下腔出血)。4例无颅内压升高临床症状的患者中,2例仅出现血管杂音,1例出现血管杂音和眩晕,另1例出现血管杂音和出血性梗死。dAVF采用血管内治疗(动脉入路:3例,静脉入路:6例,动静脉联合入路:13例)。每位患者的血管内治疗次数为1至7次(平均2.8次)。血管内治疗后,12例dAVF完全闭塞的患者,VHT的血管造影征象消失且临床治愈。8例dAVF部分闭塞的患者中,4例VHT的血管造影征象消失且临床治愈(2例几乎完全闭塞);另外4例仅VHT的血管造影征象减轻且临床症状改善。在所有16例临床治愈的患者中,尽管4例患者仍存在dAVF分流,但VHT的血管造影征象消失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验