Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜检查术治疗急性小肠梗阻是否安全有效?

Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction?

作者信息

Strickland P, Lourie D J, Suddleson E A, Blitz J B, Stain S C

机构信息

Huntington Memorial Hospital, Department of Medical Education, 100 West California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1999 Jul;13(7):695-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649901075.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute small bowel obstruction (SBO) has been a relative contraindication for laparoscopic treatment due to the potential for bowel distention and the risk of enteric injury. However, as laparoscopic experience has increased, surgeons have begun to apply minimal access techniques to the management of acute SBO.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients with acute SBO in whom laparoscopic treatment was attempted. Patients with chronic symptoms and elective admission were excluded. Patients treated by laparoscopy were compared to those converted to laparotomy for differences in morbidity, postoperative length of stay, and return of bowel function as evidenced by toleration of a liquid diet.

RESULTS

Laparoscopy was performed in 40 patients for acute SBO. The etiologies of obstruction included adhesions (35 cases), Meckel's diverticulum (two cases), femoral hernia (one case), periappendiceal abscess (one case), and regional enteritis (one case). Laparoscopic treatment was possible in 24 patients (60%), but 13 patients required conversion to laparotomy for inadequate laparoscopic visualization (two cases), infarcted bowel (two cases), enterotomy (four cases), and inability to relieve the obstruction laparoscopically (five cases). There were ten complications-one in the laparoscopic group (pneumonia) and nine in the converted group (prolonged ileus, four cases; wound infection, two cases; pneumonia, two cases; and perioperative myocardial infarction, one case). Respectively, the laparoscopic and converted groups had mean operative times of 68 and 106 min a mean return of bowel function of 1.8 and 6.2 days, and a mean postoperative stay of 3.6 and 10.5 days. Long-term follow-up was available in 34 patients. One recurrence of SBO requiring operation occurred in each group during a mean follow-up of 88 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of acute SBO in selected patients. This approach requires surgeons to have a low threshold for conversion to laparotomy. Laparoscopic treatment appears to result in an earlier return of bowel function and a shorter postoperative length of stay, and it will likely have lower costs.

摘要

背景

由于存在肠扩张的可能性及肠损伤风险,急性小肠梗阻(SBO)一直是腹腔镜治疗的相对禁忌证。然而,随着腹腔镜经验的增加,外科医生已开始将微创技术应用于急性SBO的治疗。

方法

对所有尝试进行腹腔镜治疗的急性SBO患者进行回顾性研究。排除有慢性症状及择期入院的患者。将接受腹腔镜治疗的患者与转为开腹手术的患者在发病率、术后住院时间及肠道功能恢复情况(以能耐受流食为依据)方面进行比较。

结果

40例急性SBO患者接受了腹腔镜检查。梗阻病因包括粘连(35例)、梅克尔憩室(2例)、股疝(1例)、阑尾周围脓肿(1例)和局限性肠炎(1例)。24例患者(60%)可行腹腔镜治疗,但13例患者因腹腔镜视野不佳(2例)、肠梗死(2例)、肠切开术(4例)及无法通过腹腔镜解除梗阻(5例)而需转为开腹手术。共有10例并发症——腹腔镜组1例(肺炎),转为开腹手术组9例(肠梗阻延长,4例;伤口感染,2例;肺炎,2例;围手术期心肌梗死,1例)。腹腔镜组和转为开腹手术组的平均手术时间分别为68分钟和106分钟,肠道功能平均恢复时间分别为1.8天和6.2天,平均术后住院时间分别为3.6天和10.5天。34例患者获得长期随访。在平均88周的随访期间,每组均有1例SBO复发需要再次手术。

结论

对于部分急性SBO患者,腹腔镜检查是一种安全有效的治疗方法。这种方法要求外科医生有较低的转为开腹手术的阈值。腹腔镜治疗似乎能使肠道功能更早恢复,术后住院时间更短,且可能费用更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验