MacLeod M S, Turnbull O H
Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jun;37(6):707-13. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00115-8.
An important variant of the traditional line bisection task has involved a mechanical device invented by Bisiach and his colleagues (Bisiach et al. Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology 1990;40:1278-81 [3]). This tool was devised to dissociate motor from perceptual factors in hemi-spatial neglect, by means of a mid-line indicator which moved 'congruently' or 'non-congruently' with the direction of hand movement. In the non-congruent condition, Bisiach was able to demonstrate a reduction, or reversal, of the direction of bisection error in a number of patients with neglect. These errors were interpreted as instances of 'motor' neglect. Bisiach et al. [3] also tested 10 normal subjects, who did not differ on the two conditions of the task. However, the original experiment [3] required the use of the right hand only, and it has since become clear that bisection errors in normal subjects (i.e. pseudoneglect) are more substantial when dextral subjects use their left hands. By using a modified version of the Bisiach Tool we show that there is an effect of the motor versus perceptual condition on this task, but only when subjects use their non-dominant (left) hand.
传统线段二等分任务的一个重要变体涉及到比西亚克及其同事发明的一种机械设备(比西亚克等人,《半侧空间忽视的感知和运动前因素》,《神经病学》1990年;40:1278 - 1281 [3])。这个工具旨在通过一个中线指示器来区分半侧空间忽视中的运动因素和感知因素,该指示器会与手部运动方向“一致”或“不一致”地移动。在不一致的条件下,比西亚克能够证明一些忽视患者的二等分误差方向有所减少或反转。这些误差被解释为“运动性”忽视的实例。比西亚克等人[3]还测试了10名正常受试者,他们在任务的两种条件下没有差异。然而,最初的实验[3]只要求使用右手,并且后来已经明确,当右利手受试者使用左手时,正常受试者(即假性忽视)的二等分误差会更大。通过使用比西亚克工具的改进版本,我们表明在这个任务中存在运动与感知条件的影响,但仅当受试者使用其非优势(左)手时才会出现这种影响。