Zwijnenburg A J, Lobbezoo F, Kroon G W, Naeije M
Department of Oral Function, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands.
Arch Oral Biol. 1999 May;44(5):395-401. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(99)00016-3.
Anatomical and electromyographical evidence suggests a compartmentalized function of the human jaw-closing muscles during both static and dynamic motor tasks. However, the voluntary nature of these tasks hampers unequivocal interpretation of this evidence, because it is impossible to activate voluntarily a single part of a muscle exclusively. Activation of discrete, localized regions can be accomplished with electrical stimulation. A previous study confirmed a functional subdivision of the temporalis muscle into at least three parts. Here, differences in the direction of the lower incisal-point (IP) movement in response to electrical stimulation of four different parts of the masseter muscle were examined in five healthy men. The deep masseter muscle and the anterior, middle, and posterior parts of the superficial masseter muscle were stimulated with monopolar wire electrodes in four different jaw positions (resting position; 50% maximum mouth opening; and 10-mm right and left lateral excursions, both with respect to resting position). Electrode-insertion depth was measured from magnetic resonance images. Movement responses to stimulation were recorded with the OKAS-3D jaw-movement analysis system. The variation in the direction of the IP movement in response to stimulation of parts of the masseter was partly explained by the effects of stimulus location and jaw position. The response to stimulation of the deep masseter was mainly laterovertically directed, whereas the response to stimulation of each of the superficial parts had a mainly anterovertical direction, the responses being most pronounced with the mandible in its resting position. These results provide further evidence for a functional subdivision of the masseter into a superficial part and a deep part, but not for a further subdivision of the superficial part into an anterior, middle, and posterior part.
解剖学和肌电图证据表明,在静态和动态运动任务中,人类闭口肌具有分区功能。然而,这些任务的自主性妨碍了对这一证据的明确解读,因为不可能仅自主激活一块肌肉的单个部分。离散、局部区域的激活可以通过电刺激来实现。先前的一项研究证实颞肌至少可分为三个功能部分。在此,对五名健康男性在接受咬肌四个不同部位电刺激时,下切牙点(IP)移动方向的差异进行了研究。使用单极线状电极在四个不同的颌位(休息位;最大开口度的50%;相对于休息位,左右各10毫米的侧方偏移)刺激咬肌深层以及咬肌浅层的前、中、后部分。电极插入深度通过磁共振图像测量。使用OKAS - 3D颌运动分析系统记录刺激后的运动反应。咬肌各部分刺激引起的IP移动方向变化部分可由刺激位置和颌位的影响来解释。咬肌深层刺激的反应主要是侧向垂直方向,而浅层各部分刺激的反应主要是前垂直方向,在下颌处于休息位时反应最为明显。这些结果为咬肌分为浅层和深层的功能细分提供了进一步证据,但并未为浅层进一步细分为前、中、后部分提供证据。