Kolettis T M, Kyriakides Z S, Popov T, Mesiskli T, Papalambrou A, Kremastinos D T
Second Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jun;22(6 Pt 1):871-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb06810.x.
Experimental animal data have indicated that the site of ventricular tachycardia origin and, hence, the degree of asynchronous contraction, may influence the hemodynamic tolerance during sustained ventricular tachycardia. However, data in man are scarce. We studied patients with preserved left ventricular function and absence of significant coronary artery disease. Ventricular tachycardia was simulated with rapid pacing (at 120 and 150 beats/min), performed randomly, from the right ventricular apex or the right ventricular outflow tract. Following pacing from one site, it was repeated from the alternate site. Compared to outflow tract pacing, QRS duration was significantly longer during rapid pacing from the apex. Left ventricular pressure was recorded using a micromanometer-tipped catheter. During sinus rhythm, peak systolic pressure was 142 +/- 14 mmHg; at 120 beats/min, it decreased to 109 +/- 12 mmHg during pacing from the apex and to 127 +/- 21 mmHg during pacing from the outflow tract (P = 0.008). This difference diminished at 150 beats/min (101 +/- 16 mmHg vs 112 +/- 16 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.21). During sinus rhythm end-diastolic pressure was 13 +/- 1 mmHg, which did not change significantly during pacing at 120 beats/min. During pacing at 150 beats/min, end-diastolic pressure increased to 21 +/- 3 mmHg during pacing from the apex and to 16 +/- 2 mmHg during pacing from the outflow tract (P = 0.005). Changes in first derivative of pressure and in isovolumic relaxation time constant were comparable during pacing from the two sites. Thus, it seems that tachycardias originating from the right ventricular outflow tract result in more favorable left ventricular hemodynamics, compared to those from the right ventricular apex.
实验动物数据表明,室性心动过速的起源部位,进而异步收缩的程度,可能会影响持续性室性心动过速期间的血流动力学耐受性。然而,人类相关数据较少。我们研究了左心室功能保留且无明显冠状动脉疾病的患者。通过快速起搏(120次/分和150次/分)模拟室性心动过速,起搏部位随机选择右心室心尖或右心室流出道。从一个部位起搏后,再从另一个部位重复起搏。与流出道起搏相比,从心尖快速起搏时QRS时限明显更长。使用微测压导管记录左心室压力。在窦性心律时,收缩压峰值为142±14mmHg;在120次/分时,从心尖起搏时降至109±12mmHg,从流出道起搏时降至127±21mmHg(P = 0.008)。这种差异在150次/分时减小(分别为101±16mmHg和112±16mmHg,P = 0.21)。在窦性心律时舒张末期压力为13±1mmHg,在120次/分起搏时无明显变化。在150次/分起搏时,从心尖起搏时舒张末期压力升至21±3mmHg,从流出道起搏时升至16±2mmHg(P = 0.005)。在两个部位起搏期间,压力一阶导数和等容舒张时间常数的变化相当。因此,与起源于右心室心尖的心动过速相比,起源于右心室流出道的心动过速似乎导致更有利的左心室血流动力学。