Singh A, Besson G, Mobasher A, Collman R G
Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6060, USA.
J Virol. 1999 Aug;73(8):6680-90. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.8.6680-6690.1999.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is highly compartmentalized, with distinct viral genotypes being found in the lungs, brain, and other organs compared with blood. CCR5 and CXCR4 are the principal HIV-1 coreceptors, and a number of other molecules support entry in vitro but their roles in vivo are uncertain. To address the relationship between tissue compartmentalization and the selective use of entry coreceptors, we generated functional env clones from primary isolates derived from the lungs and blood of three infected individuals and analyzed their use of the principal, secondary, orphan, and virus-encoded coreceptors for fusion. All Env proteins from lung viruses used CCR5 but not CXCR4, while those from blood viruses used CCR5 or CXCR4 or both. The orphan receptor APJ was widely used for fusion by Env proteins from both blood and lung viruses, but none used the cytomegalovirus-encoded receptor US28. Fusion mediated by the secondary coreceptors CCR2b, CCR3, CCR8, and CX3CR1 and orphan receptors GPR1, GPR15, and STRL33 was variable and heterogeneous, with relatively broad utilization by env clones from isolates of one subject but limited use by env clones from the other two subjects. However, there was no clear distinction between blood and lung viruses in secondary or orphan coreceptor fusion patterns. In contrast to fusion, none of the secondary or orphan receptors enabled efficient productive infection. These results confirm, at the level of cofactor utilization, previous observations that HIV-1 populations in the lungs and blood are biologically distinct and demonstrate diversity within lung-derived as well as blood-derived quasispecies. However, the heterogeneity in coreceptor utilization among clones from each isolate and the lack of clear distinction between lung- and blood-derived Env proteins argue against selective coreceptor utilization as a major determinant of compartmentalization.
1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)感染具有高度的区室化特征,与血液相比,在肺部、大脑和其他器官中可发现不同的病毒基因型。CCR5和CXCR4是主要的HIV-1共受体,还有一些其他分子在体外支持病毒进入,但它们在体内的作用尚不确定。为了研究组织区室化与进入共受体的选择性使用之间的关系,我们从三名受感染个体的肺部和血液中分离出的原始毒株中构建了功能性env克隆,并分析了它们对主要、次要、孤儿和病毒编码共受体的融合使用情况。来自肺部病毒的所有Env蛋白都使用CCR5而不使用CXCR4,而来自血液病毒的Env蛋白则使用CCR5或CXCR4或两者。孤儿受体APJ被来自血液和肺部病毒的Env蛋白广泛用于融合,但没有一种使用巨细胞病毒编码的受体US28。由次要共受体CCR2b、CCR3、CCR8和CX3CR1以及孤儿受体GPR1、GPR15和STRL33介导的融合是可变的且异质性的,来自一名受试者分离株的env克隆使用相对广泛,而来自其他两名受试者的env克隆使用有限。然而,在次要或孤儿共受体融合模式上,血液和肺部病毒之间没有明显区别。与融合不同,次要或孤儿受体均不能实现有效的生产性感染。这些结果在辅助因子利用水平上证实了先前的观察结果,即肺部和血液中的HIV-1群体在生物学上是不同的,并证明了肺部来源和血液来源的准种内存在多样性。然而,每个分离株的克隆之间共受体利用的异质性以及肺部和血液来源的Env蛋白之间缺乏明显区别,表明共受体的选择性利用并非区室化的主要决定因素。