McCormick D, Fine M J, Coley C M, Marrie T J, Lave J R, Obrosky D S, Kapoor W N, Singer D E
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Am J Med. 1999 Jul;107(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00158-8.
To assess the variation in length of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia and to determine whether patients who are treated in hospitals with shorter mean stays have worse medical outcomes.
We prospectively studied a cohort of 1,188 adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia who had been admitted to one community and three university teaching hospitals. We compared patients' mean length of stay, mortality, hospital readmission, return to usual activities, return to work, and pneumonia-related symptoms among the four study hospitals. All outcomes were adjusted for baseline differences in severity of illness and comorbidity.
Adjusted interhospital differences in mean length of stay ranged from 0.9 to 2.3 days (P <0.001). When the risk of each medical outcome was compared between patients admitted to the hospital with the shortest length of stay and those admitted to longer stay hospitals, there were no differences in mortality [relative risk (RR) = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.7], hospital readmission (RR = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2), return to usual activities (RR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.3), or return to work (RR = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.0) during the first 14 days after discharge, or in the mean number of pneumonia-related symptoms 30 days after admission (P = 0.54).
We observed substantial interhospital variation in the lengths of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. The finding that medical outcomes were similar in patients admitted to the hospital with the shortest length of stay and those admitted to hospitals with longer mean lengths of stay suggests that hospitals with longer stays may be able to reduce the mean duration of hospitalization for this disease without adversely affecting patient outcomes.
评估社区获得性肺炎住院患者的住院时间差异,并确定在平均住院时间较短的医院接受治疗的患者是否有更差的医疗结局。
我们前瞻性地研究了一组1188例社区获得性肺炎成年患者,这些患者被收治于一家社区医院和三家大学教学医院。我们比较了四家研究医院患者的平均住院时间、死亡率、再次入院率、恢复日常活动情况、恢复工作情况以及肺炎相关症状。所有结局均针对疾病严重程度和合并症的基线差异进行了调整。
调整后的医院间平均住院时间差异为0.9至2.3天(P<0.001)。将住院时间最短的医院收治的患者与住院时间较长的医院收治的患者的每种医疗结局风险进行比较时,出院后前14天内的死亡率[相对风险(RR)=0.7;95%可信区间(CI),0.3至1.7]、再次入院率(RR = 0.8;95%CI,0.5至1.2)、恢复日常活动情况(RR = 1.1;95%CI,0.9至1.3)或恢复工作情况(RR = 1.2;95%CI,0.8至2.0),以及入院30天后肺炎相关症状的平均数量均无差异(P = 0.54)。
我们观察到社区获得性肺炎住院患者的住院时间在医院间存在显著差异。住院时间最短的医院收治的患者与平均住院时间较长的医院收治的患者医疗结局相似,这一发现表明住院时间较长的医院可能能够缩短该疾病的平均住院时间,而不会对患者结局产生不利影响。