Foster N E, Thompson K A, Baxter G D, Allen J M
School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, UK.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 1;24(13):1332-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00011.
A descriptive questionnaire of chartered physiotherapists.
To investigate current physiotherapeutic management of low back pain throughout Britain and Ireland.
Physiotherapists play a key role in low back pain management. Although clinical guidelines for best practice have been developed recently, there has been no large-scale attempt to describe current physiotherapeutic treatment approaches within Britain or Ireland.
After semi-structured interviews (n = 6) and two pilot studies (n = 77) were done, postal questionnaires were distributed to four regional cluster samples of the membership of two physiotherapy professional organizations (n = 2654). After two mailings, a random sample of 90 nonresponders were followed up. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Ltd., Woking, Surrey, UK), and precision of the survey estimates was assessed by calculation of sampling errors and intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster sampling.
Results were received from 1548 therapists (total response rate, 58.3%); of these, 813 reported that they were practicing in settings in which they treated patients with low back pain. Analysis of the results indicated the overall popularity of the Maitland mobilization and McKenzie approaches among physiotherapists. Although exercise per se was mentioned frequently by respondents, a marked difference in opinion among therapists regarding the optimal type of exercise for low back pain was obvious. Little evidence was demonstrated of the use of manipulation, fitness programs, or multidisciplinary efforts involving behavioral and physical aspects of treatment. Commonly used methods of electrotherapy were interferential therapy, ultrasound, pulsed short-wave diathermy, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
The results of this study emphasize the need to evaluate further and improve the dissemination of findings regarding the effectiveness of specific physiotherapy approaches for low back pain management.
针对特许物理治疗师的描述性问卷调查。
调查英国和爱尔兰目前对腰痛的物理治疗管理情况。
物理治疗师在腰痛管理中发挥关键作用。尽管最近已制定了最佳实践临床指南,但尚未有大规模尝试描述英国或爱尔兰目前的物理治疗方法。
在进行了半结构化访谈(n = 6)和两项试点研究(n = 77)之后,向两个物理治疗专业组织成员的四个区域聚类样本(n = 2654)发放了邮政问卷。经过两次邮寄后,对90名未回复者进行了随机随访。使用社会科学统计软件包(英国萨里郡沃金市SPSS有限公司)对数据进行分析,并通过计算抽样误差和聚类抽样的组内相关系数来评估调查估计的精度。
收到了1548名治疗师的回复(总回复率为58.3%);其中,813人报告他们在治疗腰痛患者的环境中执业。结果分析表明,梅特兰松动术和麦肯齐方法在物理治疗师中总体上很受欢迎。尽管受访者经常提到运动本身,但治疗师对于腰痛最佳运动类型的意见存在明显差异。几乎没有证据表明使用了手法治疗、健身计划或涉及行为和身体治疗方面的多学科方法。常用的电疗法包括干扰电疗法、超声波疗法、脉冲短波透热疗法和经皮电刺激神经疗法。
本研究结果强调需要进一步评估并改善关于特定物理治疗方法对腰痛管理有效性的研究结果的传播。