Takano H, Ise T, Nomoto M, Kato K, Murakami T, Ohmori H, Imamura T, Nagatani G, Okamoto T, Ohta R, Furukawa M, Shibao K, Izumi H, Kuwano M, Kohno K
Department of Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Anticancer Drug Des. 1999 Apr;14(2):87-92.
We have previously shown that the DNA topoisomerase II alpha (topo II alpha) gene is down-regulated in VP16/VM26-resistant cells at the transcriptional level. To determine the DNA elements responsible for down-regulation, the transcriptional activities of luciferase reporter constructs containing various lengths of the promoter sequences were investigated by transient transfection of two resistant cell lines, KB/VP2 and KB/VM4. The transcriptional activities of the full-length promoter (-295 to +85) and of three deletion constructs (-197, -154 and -74 to +85) were significantly down-regulated in resistant cells. In contrast, the transcriptional activity of the minimal promoter (-20 to +85) in resistant cells was similar to that in parental KB cells. Furthermore, introduction of a mutation in ICE1 abolished the down-regulation of the topo II alpha promoter activity in drug-resistant cells. In vivo footprinting analysis of topo II alpha gene promoter revealed several specific protein-binding sites, a GC box, ICE1, ICE2 and ICE3. In vivo footprinting analysis also identified a cluster of hypersensitive sites. However, there was no marked difference in protein-binding sites between parental and resistant cells. To confirm our previous results, we have established the VP16-resistant cell lines T12-VP1 and T12-VP2 from T12 cells derived from human bladder cancer T24 cells stably transfected with the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene driven by the topo II alpha gene promoter. The expression to topo II alpha was down-regulated in both cell lines. We also found that CAT gene expression was significantly decreased to one-fifth of that in T12 parental cells. These results suggest that the expression of the topo II alpha gene requires the binding of multiple factors to the core promoter and is down-regulated at the transcriptional level, probably through binding of a negative factor to ICE1 in drug-resistant cells.
我们之前已经表明,DNA拓扑异构酶IIα(拓扑IIα)基因在对VP16/VM26耐药的细胞中在转录水平上被下调。为了确定负责下调的DNA元件,通过瞬时转染两种耐药细胞系KB/VP2和KB/VM4,研究了含有不同长度启动子序列的荧光素酶报告基因构建体的转录活性。全长启动子(-295至+85)和三个缺失构建体(-197、-154和-74至+85)的转录活性在耐药细胞中显著下调。相比之下,耐药细胞中最小启动子(-20至+85)的转录活性与亲代KB细胞中的相似。此外,ICE1中的突变消除了耐药细胞中拓扑IIα启动子活性的下调。对拓扑IIα基因启动子的体内足迹分析揭示了几个特定的蛋白质结合位点、一个GC盒、ICE1、ICE2和ICE3。体内足迹分析还确定了一组超敏位点。然而,亲代细胞和耐药细胞之间在蛋白质结合位点上没有明显差异。为了证实我们之前的结果,我们从稳定转染了由拓扑IIα基因启动子驱动的氯霉素乙酰转移酶报告基因的人膀胱癌T24细胞衍生的T12细胞中建立了对VP16耐药的细胞系T12-VP1和T12-VP2。两种细胞系中拓扑IIα的表达均下调。我们还发现,CAT基因表达显著降低至T12亲代细胞的五分之一。这些结果表明,拓扑IIα基因的表达需要多种因子与核心启动子结合,并且在转录水平上被下调,可能是通过耐药细胞中一种负因子与ICE1结合实现的。